Advantages of integrated and sustainability based assessment for metabolism based strategic planning of urban water systems.

Despite providing water-related services as the primary purpose of urban water system (UWS), all relevant activities require capital investments and operational expenditures, consume resources (e.g. materials and chemicals), and may increase negative environmental impacts (e.g. contaminant discharge, emissions to water and air). Performance assessment of such a metabolic system may require developing a holistic approach which encompasses various system elements and criteria. This paper analyses the impact of integration of UWS components on the metabolism based performance assessment for future planning using a number of intervention strategies. It also explores the importance of sustainability based criteria in the assessment of long-term planning. Two assessment approaches analysed here are: (1) planning for only water supply system (WSS) as a part of the UWS and (2) planning for an integrated UWS including potable water, stormwater, wastewater and water recycling. WaterMet(2) model is used to simulate metabolic type processes in the UWS and calculate quantitative performance indicators. The analysis is demonstrated on the problem of strategic level planning of a real-world UWS to where optional intervention strategies are applied. The resulting performance is assessed using the multiple criteria of both conventional and sustainability type; and optional intervention strategies are then ranked using the Compromise Programming method. The results obtained show that the high ranked intervention strategies in the integrated UWS are those supporting both water supply and stormwater/wastewater subsystems (e.g. rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling schemes) whilst these strategies are ranked low in the WSS and those targeting improvement of water supply components only (e.g. rehabilitation of clean water pipes and addition of new water resources) are preferred instead. Results also demonstrate that both conventional and sustainability type performance indicators are necessary for strategic planning in the UWS.

[1]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  WaterMet2 : A tool for integrated analysis of sustainability-based performance of urban water systems , 2014 .

[2]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Economic assessment tool for greywater recycling systems , 2005 .

[3]  H. Malano,et al.  Water–energy–greenhouse gas nexus of urban water systems: Review of concepts, state-of-art and methods , 2014 .

[4]  Francisco J. André,et al.  Computing compromise solutions: On the connections between compromise programming and composite programming , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  Rae Mackay,et al.  SWITCH city water balance: a scoping model for integrated urban water management , 2010 .

[6]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[7]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Metabolism-modelling approaches to long-term sustainability assessment of urban water services , 2017 .

[8]  T. Vesala,et al.  Sustainable urban metabolism as a link between bio-physical sciences and urban planning : the BRIDGE project , 2013 .

[9]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Quantitative UWS performance model: WaterMet2 , 2014 .

[10]  Barry J. Adams,et al.  Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems , 2005 .

[11]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Modelling metabolism based performance of an urban water system using WaterMet2 , 2015 .

[12]  J. O'Sullivan,et al.  A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: presenting the Dynamic Urban Water Simulation Model. , 2013, Water research.

[13]  Guangtao Fu,et al.  The impact of new developments on river water quality from an integrated system modelling perspective. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Hwong‐wen Ma,et al.  Urban water metabolism efficiency assessment: integrated analysis of available and virtual water. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Parviz Fattahi,et al.  A Compromise Programming Model to Integrated Urban Water Management , 2010 .

[16]  F A Memon,et al.  Performance of a large building rainwater harvesting system. , 2012, Water research.

[17]  Joseph A. Tainter,et al.  A Framework for Sustainability , 2003 .

[18]  R. Ashley,et al.  Sustainable Water Services: a Procedural Guide , 2004 .

[19]  Denis Ruelland,et al.  Integrated modelling to assess long-term water supply capacity of a meso-scale Mediterranean catchment. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Robert B. Gibson,et al.  Large dam development in India: sustainability criteria for the assessment of critical river basin infrastructure , 2013 .

[21]  P. Brunner,et al.  Metabolism of the Anthroposphere , 1991 .

[22]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The Changing Metabolism of Cities , 2007 .

[23]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach , 2000 .

[24]  Tanja Srebotnjak Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[25]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Dynamic metabolism modelling of urban water services--demonstrating effectiveness as a decision-support tool for Oslo, Norway. , 2014, Water research.

[26]  Kourosh Behzadian,et al.  Decision support system for metabolism-based transition to urban water systems of tomorrow , 2016 .

[27]  M. B. Beck,et al.  The energy-water-food nexus: strategic analysis of technologies for transforming the urban metabolism. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Ca Boyle Framework for Sustainability Indicators for Engineers , 1999 .

[29]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[30]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Integrated System Dynamics Modelling for water scarcity assessment: case study of the Kairouan region. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Mark S. Morley,et al.  Resilience-Based Performance Assessment of Water-Recycling Schemes in Urban Water Systems , 2014 .

[32]  Andrew Moffat Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[33]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[34]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Dynamic performance metrics to assess sustainability and cost effectiveness of integrated urban water systems , 2010 .

[35]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Source to tap urban water cycle modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Water Resources Systems Planning And Management , 2006 .

[37]  S. Liu,et al.  Decision support for sustainable option selection in integrated urban water management , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Nicholas J. Ashbolt,et al.  Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems , 2008 .

[39]  Tanja Srebotnjak Environmental Performance Index , 2008 .

[40]  Abdelghani Bekrar,et al.  Resilience-based performance assessment of strain situations in emergency departments , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM).

[41]  D van der Leer,et al.  An assessment, by computational simulation, of random daytime sampling for the optimisation of plumbosolvency control treatment measures , 2005 .

[42]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems 1 , 2005 .

[43]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Modelling the catchment-scale environmental impacts of wastewater treatment in an urban sewage system for CO₂ emission assessment. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[44]  Helena Alegre,et al.  Framework for Sustainability Assessment of UWCS and development of a self-assessment tool , 2014 .

[45]  Kourosh Behzadian,et al.  Decision support system for the long-term city metabolism planning problem , 2016 .

[46]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Intelligent Urban Water Infrastructure Management , 2013 .

[47]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..