Prevalence and clinical association of gene mutations through multiplex mutation testing in patients with NSCLC: results from the ETOP Lungscape Project

Background Reported prevalence of driver gene mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly variable and clinical correlations are emerging. Using NSCLC biomaterial and clinical data from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape iBiobank, we explore the epidemiology of mutations and association to clinicopathologic features and patient outcome (relapse-free survival, time-to-relapse, overall survival). Methods Clinically annotated, resected stage I-III NSCLC FFPE tissue was assessed for gene mutation using a microfluidics-based multiplex PCR platform. Mutant-allele detection sensitivity is >1% for most of the ∼150 (13 genes) mutations covered in the multiplex test. Results Multiplex testing has been carried out in 2063 (76.2%) of the 2709 Lungscape cases (median follow-up 4.8 years). FFPE samples mostly date from 2005 to 2008, yet recently extracted DNA quality and quantity was generally good. Average DNA yield/case was 2.63 µg; 38 cases (1.4%) failed QC and were excluded from study; 95.1% of included cases allowed the complete panel of mutations to be tested. Most common were KRAS, MET, EGFR and PIK3CA mutations with overall prevalence of 23.0%, 6.8%, 5.4% and 4.9%, respectively. KRAS and EGFR mutations were significantly more frequent in adenocarcinomas: PIK3CA in squamous cell carcinomas. MET mutation prevalence did not differ between histology groups. EGFR mutations were found predominantly in never smokers; KRAS in current/former smokers. For all the above mutations, there was no difference in outcome between mutated and non-mutated cases. Conclusion Archival FFPE NSCLC material is adequate for multiplex mutation analysis. In this large, predominantly European, clinically annotated stage I-III NSCLC cohort, none of the mutations characterized showed prognostic significance.

[1]  P. Stephens,et al.  Characterization of 298 Patients with Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Alterations , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu,et al.  Distinct patterns of somatic genome alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[3]  P. Jänne,et al.  MET Exon 14 Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Are Associated With Advanced Age and Stage-Dependent MET Genomic Amplification and c-Met Overexpression. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Role of EGFR mutations in lung cancers: prognosis and tumor chemosensitivity , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[5]  M. Hellmich,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Genetic heterogeneity, prognostic impact and incidence of prior malignancies , 2014, Oncotarget.

[6]  A. Marchetti,et al.  Lungscape: Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Outcome by Clinical and Pathological Parameters , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[7]  C. Dooms,et al.  Second ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: pathology and molecular biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  C. Dooms,et al.  Prevalence and clinical outcomes for patients with ALK-positive resected stage I to III adenocarcinoma: results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape Project. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[10]  William Pao,et al.  Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs. , 2014, JAMA.

[11]  I. Wistuba,et al.  Biomarker Analyses from a Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study Evaluating Erlotinib ± Onartuzumab in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: MET Expression Levels Are Predictive of Patient Benefit , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  Rajesh Patel,et al.  Next Generation MUT-MAP, a High-Sensitivity High-Throughput Microfluidics Chip-Based Mutation Analysis Panel , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  G. Hampton,et al.  Targeted Biomarker Profiling of Matched Primary and Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  A. Warth,et al.  EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas: patient outcome, interplay with morphology and immunophenotype , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[15]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. , 2013, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[16]  R. Salgia,et al.  Lack of Association of C-Met-N375S Sequence Variant with Lung Cancer Susceptibility and Prognosis , 2013, International journal of medical sciences.

[17]  P. Jänne,et al.  Pooled analysis of the prognostic and predictive effects of KRAS mutation status and KRAS mutation subtype in early-stage resected non-small-cell lung cancer in four trials of adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  C. Kang,et al.  The Presence of Mutations in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Is Not a Prognostic Factor for Long-Term Outcome after Surgical Resection of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[19]  Rajesh Patel,et al.  Mutation Scanning Using MUT-MAP, a High-Throughput, Microfluidic Chip-Based, Multi-Analyte Panel , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Angela N. Brooks,et al.  Mapping the Hallmarks of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Massively Parallel Sequencing , 2012, Cell.

[22]  Biao He,et al.  A practical molecular assay to predict survival in resected non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: development and international validation studies , 2012, The Lancet.

[23]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  Pengyuan Liu,et al.  Gene-Expression Signature Predicts Postoperative Recurrence in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  Antonio Marchetti,et al.  Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring BRAF mutations. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  A. Marchetti,et al.  Clinical implications of KRAS mutations in lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: an important role for mutations in minor clones. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[27]  Jie Liang,et al.  Ethnic Differences and Functional Analysis of MET Mutations in Lung Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Takayuki Kosaka,et al.  Prognostic Implication of EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 Gene Mutations in a Large Cohort of Japanese Patients with Surgically Treated Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[29]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Gene expression–based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[30]  V. Seshan,et al.  Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[31]  Stefano Monti,et al.  Gene expression profiling reveals reproducible human lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in multiple independent patient cohorts. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  M Paesmans,et al.  The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[33]  R. Salgia,et al.  c-MET mutational analysis in small cell lung cancer: novel juxtamembrane domain mutations regulating cytoskeletal functions. , 2003, Cancer research.

[34]  David E. Misek,et al.  Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[35]  A. Warth,et al.  Prevalence and clinical association of MET gene amplification in patients with NSCLC: results from the ETOP lungscape project , 2015 .

[36]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer genes , 2014 .