A Selfish Chatbot Still Does not Win in the Ultimatum Game

[1]  Baptiste Jacquet,et al.  On the Lack of Pragmatic Processing in Artificial Conversational Agents , 2018, IHSED.

[2]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Reciprocity and wage undercutting , 2000 .

[3]  Katia M. Harlé,et al.  Expectations and outcome: the role of proposer features in the Ultimatum Game , 2011 .

[4]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Estimating the Impact of "Humanizing" Customer Service Chatbots , 2020, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  E. Petit.  Émotions et prise de décision dans le jeu de l'ultimatum , 2009 .

[6]  Baptiste Jacquet,et al.  Contextual Information Helps Understand Messages Written with Textisms , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[7]  Baptiste Jacquet,et al.  Towards a Pragmatic Model of an Artificial Conversational Partner: Opening the Blackbox , 2019, ISAT.

[8]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Testing Theories of Fairness - Intentions Matter , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[9]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Strategic behavior in public good games: when partners drift apart , 1999 .

[10]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers , 1996 .

[12]  Mind-Reading Chatbots: We Are Not There Yet , 2020, IHIET.

[13]  S. Blount.  When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences , 1995 .

[14]  Jean Baratgin,et al.  Cooperation in Online Conversations: The Response Times as a Window Into the Cognition of Language Processing , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[15]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[16]  Jean-Christian Tisserand.  Le jeu de l'ultimatum, une méta-analyse de 30 années de recherches expérimentales , 2017 .