论文信息 - Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

Comparison of three methods for shape recognition in the case of mine detection

Abstract Three methods for shape recognition and their usefulness are analyzed and compared in the scope of the antipersonnel mine detection problem. It is shown that, because of the variety and complexity of the problem, neither of them can be completely discarded.

Nada Milisavljevic | N. Milisavljevic

[1] R. Nevatia,et al. Perceptual Organization for Scene Segmentation and Description , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2] Michael D. Alder,et al. Inference of Syntax for Point Sets , 1994 .

[3] Jack Perkins,et al. Pattern recognition in practice , 1980 .

[4] Michael D. Alder,et al. Technical Report - The Hough Transform versus the UpWrite , 1997 .

[5] Robert A. McLaughlin,et al. Randomized Hough Transform: Improved ellipse detection with comparison , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6] V. F. F. Leavers. Shape Detection in Computer Vision Using the Hough Transform , 2011 .

[7] Erkki Oja,et al. A new curve detection method: Randomized Hough transform (RHT) , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8] Edward M. Riseman,et al. Computing curvilinear structure by token-based grouping , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9] Erkki Oja,et al. Randomized hough transform (rht) : Basic mech-anisms, algorithms, and computational complexities , 1993 .

[10] Michael D. Alder,et al. A nonparametric approach for detecting lines and curves , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11] Erkki Oja,et al. Comparisons of Probabilistic and Non-probabilistic Hough Transforms , 1994, ECCV.