A Cross-Linguistic fMRI Study of Spectral and Temporal Cues Underlying Phonological Processing

It remains a matter of controversy precisely what kind of neural mechanisms underlie functional asymmetries in speech processing. Whereas some studies support speech-specific circuits, others suggest that lateralization is dictated by relative computational demands of complex auditory signals in the spectral or time domains. To examine how the brain processes linguistically relevant spectral and temporal information, a functional magnetic resonance imaging study was conducted using Thai speech, in which spectral processing associated with lexical tones and temporal processing associated with vowel length can be differentiated. Ten Thai and 10 Chinese subjects were asked to perform discrimination judgments of pitch and timing patterns presented in the same auditory stimuli under two different conditions: speech (Thai) and nonspeech (hums). In the speech condition, tasks required judging Thai tones (T) and vowel length (VL); in the nonspeech condition, homologous pitch contours (P) and duration patterns (D). A remaining task required listening passively to nonspeech hums (L). Only the Thai group showed activation in the left inferior prefrontal cortex in speech minus nonspeech contrasts for spectral (T vs. P) and temporal (VL vs. D) cues. Thai and Chinese groups, however, exhibited similar fronto-parietal activation patterns in nonspeech hums minus passive listening contrasts for spectral (P vs. L) and temporal (D vs. L) cues. It appears that lower level specialization for acoustic cues in the spectral and temporal domains cannot be generalized to abstract higher order levels of phonological processing. Regardless of the neural mechanisms underlying low-level auditory processing, our findings clearly indicate that hemispheric specialization is sensitive to language-specific factors.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  J. Howie,et al.  Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones , 1976 .

[3]  A. Abramson,et al.  Static and dynamic acoustic cues in distinctive tones. , 1978, Language and speech.

[4]  K. Armitage,et al.  Genetic Variation in Social Mammals: The Marmot Model , 1980, Science.

[5]  P. Tallal,et al.  Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception , 1980, Science.

[6]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[7]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Distinctive vowel length: duration vs. spectrum in Thai , 1990 .

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[9]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Arthur S. Abramsont The Stability of Distinctive Vowel Lengthin Thai , 1993 .

[11]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging , 1995 .

[14]  M. Lowe,et al.  Spatially filtering functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[16]  J. Maisog,et al.  A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[17]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiology of speech perception. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Mary P. Harper,et al.  Vowel length and stress in Thai , 1998 .

[19]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Fiez,et al.  A Comment on the Functional Localization of the Phonological Storage Subsystem of Working Memory , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[22]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  A common neural substrate for the analysis of pitch and duration pattern in segmented sound? , 1999, Neuroreport.

[23]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Treatment of baseline drifts in fMRI time series analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Mark J. Lowe,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Functional Contrast from BOLD-Weighted Spin-Echo and Gradient-Echo Echoplanar Imaging at 1.5 Tesla and H215O PET in the Whole Brain , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[26]  D. Lancker,et al.  A Crosslinguistic PET Study of Tone Perception , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Price,et al.  The Constraints Functional Neuroimaging Places on Classical Models of Auditory Word Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  B. Milner,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic PET Study of Tone Perception in Mandarin Chinese and English Speakers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  A. Liberman,et al.  Parametrically Dissociating Speech and Nonspeech Perception in the Brain Using fMRI , 2001, Brain and Language.

[30]  David Poeppel,et al.  Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  The Functional Neural Architecture of Components of Attention in Language-Processing Tasks , 1998, NeuroImage.

[32]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Functional Heterogeneity of Inferior Frontal Gyrus Is Shaped by Linguistic Experience , 2001, Brain and Language.

[33]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  J. Lurito,et al.  Neural circuitry underlying perception of duration depends on language experience , 2002, Brain and Language.

[35]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  M. Lowe,et al.  Neural correlates of segmental and tonal information in speech perception , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[37]  J. Lurito,et al.  Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study , 2003, Brain and Language.

[38]  M. Lowe,et al.  Selective attention to lexical tones recruits left dorsal frontoparietal network , 2003, Neuroreport.