Osteogenic phenomena across endosteal bone-implant spaces with porous surfaced intramedullary implants.

Porous surfaced femoral components of hip prostheses stabilized by tissue ingrowth are often situated a certain distance away from the endosteal cortex in the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to examine the significance of this space between an implant and the cortex on bone growth into the porous surface of the implant. Intramedullary rods of different diameters with porous surface regions made of powder metal were inserted into the femurs of adult beagles. The rods had outside diameters of 2.5, 3.2, 4.5, and 5.5 millimeters; this variation produced endosteal bone-implant surface spaces ranging from 0 to 4 millimeters. The animals were sacrificed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Histological sections revealed that by 12 weeks the implants became generally surrounded by a thin shell of spongy bone which was joined to the endosteal cortex by bony trabeculae. This feature was most prominent for implants which were approximately 2 millimeters or less from the endosteum. Denser, more haversian-like bone developed up to and within those areas of implants which were in contact with the cortex. The development of this intramedullary type of bone could significantly contribute to the fixation strength of clinical porous surfaced prostheses whose stems do not completely fill the medulla.

[1]  I Macnab,et al.  Porous surface layered prosthetic devices. , 1975, Biomedical engineering.

[2]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  M. Semlitsch,et al.  Problems Associated with the Cement Anchorage of Artificial Joints , 1976 .

[4]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  L. Zichner,et al.  Animal studies on bone ingrowth kinetics of ceramic material under dynamic stress. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  R. W. Tock,et al.  Some effects of pore diameter on single pore bony ingression patterns in teflon. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  M. Spector,et al.  Bone growth into porous high-density polyethylene. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  S. Brown,et al.  Bone ingrowth into dynamically loaded porous-coated intramedullary nails. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  S F Hulbert,et al.  Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  J. Nilles,et al.  Porous titanium alloy for fixation of knee prosthesis. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  R. Pilliar,et al.  Evaluation of biodegradable ceramic. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  J. Galante,et al.  Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Hirschhorn,et al.  Porous titanium surgical implant materials , 1971 .