On representing coalitional games with externalities

We consider the issue of representing coalitional games in multi-agent systems with externalities (i.e., in systems where the performance of one coalition may be affected by other co-existing coalitions). In addition to the conventional partition function game representation (PFG), we propose a number of new representations based on a new notion of externalities. In contrast to conventional game theory, our new concept is not related to the process by which the coalitions are formed, but rather to the effect that each coalition may have on the entire system and vice versa. We show that the new representations are fully expressive and, for many classes of games, more concise than the conventional PFG. Building upon these new representations, we propose a number of approaches to solve the coalition structure generation problem in systems with externalities. We show that, if externalities are characterised by various degrees of regularity, the new representations allow us to adapt coalition structure generation algorithms that were originally designed for domains with no externalities, so that they can be used when externalities are present. Finally, building upon Rahwan et al. [16] and Michalak et al. [9], we present a unified method to solve the coalition structure generation problem in any system, with or without externalities, provided sufficient information is available.

[1]  Tomasz P. Michalak,et al.  Optimal Coalition Structure Generation In Partition Function Games , 2008, ECAI.

[2]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  A Compact Representation Scheme for Coalitional Games in Open Anonymous Environments , 2006, AAAI.

[3]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Marginal contribution nets: a compact representation scheme for coalitional games , 2005, EC '05.

[4]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Complexity of determining nonemptiness of the core , 2003, EC '03.

[5]  W. Lucas,et al.  N‐person games in partition function form , 1963 .

[6]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  An Anytime Algorithm for Optimal Coalition Structure Generation , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[7]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An improved dynamic programming algorithm for coalition structure generation , 2008, AAMAS.

[8]  Xiaotie Deng,et al.  On the Complexity of Cooperative Solution Concepts , 1994, Math. Oper. Res..

[9]  Tomasz P. Michalak,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Monetary and Fiscal Cooperation Among Nations , 2006 .

[10]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Methods for Task Allocation via Agent Coalition Formation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Onn Shehory,et al.  Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees , 2022 .

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Coalition Structure Generation : Dynamic Programming Meets Anytime Optimization , 2008 .

[13]  Tomasz P. Michalak,et al.  Exogenous coalition formation in the e-marketplace based on geographical proximity , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An algorithm for distributing coalitional value calculations among cooperating agents , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Robert M. Feinberg,et al.  Market Power and Incentives to Form Research Consortia , 2006 .

[16]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Computing Shapley Values, Manipulating Value Division Schemes, and Checking Core Membership in Multi-Issue Domains , 2004, AAAI.

[17]  R. Serrano,et al.  Marginal Contributions and Externalities in the Value , 2005 .

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Generating coalition structures with finite bound from the optimal guarantees , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[19]  D. Yun Yeh,et al.  A Dynamic Programming Approach to the Complete Set Partitioning Problem , 1986, BIT.