Towards a more ‘Sustainable’ Human Development Index: Integrating the environment and freedom

Abstract The Human Development Index (HDI) is one of the most widely used composite indicators of socio-economic development. However, the HDI is at the cross-roads. In order to retain its flagship role in the development arena, many scholars have called from the HDI to reinvent itself by adding sustainability dimensions. The aim of this paper is to introduce the Sustainable Human Development Index (SHDI), based on Multidimensional Synthesis of Indicators (MSI) – a new class of indexes that can be used for monitoring Sustainable Human Development (SHD). The approach we propose aims to address two primary issues regarding the HDI. The first issue involves the integration into the SHDI of two important sustainability-related dimensions that are missing in the HDI; namely, the environment and freedom (defined here in terms of political rights and civil liberties). The second issue focuses on the method of aggregation using the new class of indexes proposed. We aim to expand on the three standard HDI dimensions while avoiding problems associated with the geometric mean that tends to collapse to zero. In doing so, we manage to retain the same theoretical intuitions of the post-2010 HDI approach, i.e. to penalize the heterogeneity of outcomes. Moreover, we rely on the flexibility of the MSI approach to develop another index, the Environmentally-centered Sustainable Human Development Index (ESHDI), which puts the environmental dimension at the core of the analysis. In the first part of the paper we introduce the theoretical debate on the multidimensionality of the HDI, and consider the two new dimensions of sustainability, as well as the MSI aggregation approach. In the second part, the SHDI and the ESHDI are introduced, tested through a simulation analysis, and are compared with the HDI geometric mean using 2013 data. The simulations and the results of the empirical analysis show how the new class of indexes provide a more flexible approach to the procedure of aggregation, especially when the number of dimensions increases and/or when there is the need to stress the importance of one or more dimensions. The introduction of the two environmental and freedom sustainability dimensions greatly increases the potential of the HDI to address the SHD paradigm by capturing two core issues for the humanity and its common future.

[1]  Chuluun Togtokh,et al.  Time to stop celebrating the polluters , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Jo Dirix,et al.  The Capabilities Approach and Environmental Sustainability: The Case for Functioning Constraints , 2015 .

[3]  Meghnad Desai,et al.  Human development:Concepts and measurement , 1991 .

[4]  D. Hulme,et al.  Poverty, time and vagueness: integrating the core poverty and chronic poverty frameworks , 2010 .

[5]  Jeni Klugman,et al.  The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques , 2011 .

[6]  P. Dasgupta Well-Being and the Extent of Its Realisation in Poor Countries , 1990 .

[7]  A. Sen,et al.  Commodities and Capabilities , 1987 .

[8]  Filomena Maggino,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Poverty and Well-Being: A New Approach for the Synthesis of Multidimensionality , 2017 .

[9]  Amartya Sen,et al.  The Income Component of the Human Development Index , 2000 .

[10]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The Human Development Index and Sustainability - A Constructive Proposal , 2001 .

[11]  S. Morse Stirring the pot. Influence of changes in methodology of the Human Development Index on reporting by the press , 2014 .

[12]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[13]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Human Development and Economic Sustainability , 2000 .

[14]  Andrea Ferrannini,et al.  Sustainable Human Development: A New Territorial and People-Centred Perspective , 2014 .

[15]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  A Newer Human Development Index , 2012 .

[16]  J. K. Summers,et al.  Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index , 2013 .

[17]  Wouter Peeters,et al.  Putting Sustainability into Sustainable Human Development , 2013 .

[18]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections , 1989 .

[19]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  Multidimensional Social Evaluation: An Application to the Measurement of Human Development , 2010 .

[20]  Jeni Klugman,et al.  Measuring human progress: the contribution of the Human Development Index and related indices , 2011 .

[21]  E. Neumayer Human Development and Sustainability , 2010 .

[22]  Mahbub ul Haq,et al.  Reflections on human development , 1995 .

[23]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty , 2003 .

[24]  Satya R. Chakravarty,et al.  A Generalized Human Development Index , 2003 .

[25]  An Axiomatization of the Human Development Index , 2013 .

[26]  Amartya Sen,et al.  India: Development and Participation , 2002 .

[27]  V. Costantini,et al.  Sustainable Human Development for European Countries , 2005 .

[28]  Mozaffar Qizilbash,et al.  The capability approach : concepts, measures and applications , 2008 .

[29]  David Clark,et al.  Defining and Measuring Human Well-Being , 2014 .

[30]  Allen C. Kelley,et al.  The Human Development Index: "Handle with Care" , 1991 .

[31]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[32]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Human Development Index , 2003 .

[33]  M. Vega,et al.  HDPI: A Framework for Pollution-Sensitive Human Development Indicators , 2001 .

[34]  Martin Weale,et al.  On measuring the quality of life , 1992 .

[35]  J. Ballet,et al.  Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency , 2013 .

[36]  E. Samman,et al.  Human Development: Beyond the Human Development Index , 2006 .

[37]  Séverine Deneulin,et al.  An introduction to the human development and capability approach : freedom and agency , 2009 .

[38]  M. Hopkins Human development revisited: A new UNDP report , 1991 .

[39]  Giangiacomo Bravo,et al.  The Human Sustainable Development Index: New calculations and a first critical analysis , 2014 .