A GRASP based solution approach to solve cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problems

A novel metaheuristic which combines GRASP with quadratic programming techniques.An algorithm which combines meta-heuristic and exact solution approaches.Novel solution generation techniques with several local search procedures.The proposed approach is applied to cardinality constrained portfolio optimization.Considerable improvements on the previously reported results. In the current work, a solution methodology which combines a meta-heuristic algorithm with an exact solution approach is presented to solve cardinality constrained portfolio optimization (CCPO) problem. The proposed method is comprised of two levels, namely, stock selection and proportion determination. In stock selection level, a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) is developed. Once the stocks are selected the problem reduces to a quadratic programming problem. As GRASP ensures cardinality constraints by selecting predetermined number of stocks and quadratic programming model ensures the remaining problem constraints, no further constraint handling procedures are required. On the other hand, as the problem is decomposed into two sub-problems, total computational burden on the algorithm is considerably reduced. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated by using benchmark data sets available in the OR Library. Computational results reveal that the proposed algorithm is competitive with the state of the art algorithms in the related literature.

[1]  K. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Finding the Efficient Frontier for a Mixed Integer Portfolio Choice Problem Using a Multiobjective Algorithm , 2009 .

[2]  Yazid M. Sharaiha,et al.  Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  C. Lucas,et al.  Heuristic algorithms for the cardinality constrained efficient frontier , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Konstantinos P. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Pankaj Gupta,et al.  Asset portfolio optimization using support vector machines and real-coded genetic algorithm , 2011, Journal of Global Optimization.

[6]  Ranjit K. Roy,et al.  Design of Experiments Using The Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and Process Improvement , 2001 .

[7]  Rong Qu,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for constrained portfolio selection problems , 2013, Applied Intelligence.

[8]  Konstantinos P. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem: An experimental evaluation of five multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  Portfolio selection using neural networks , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  Celso C. Ribeiro,et al.  Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedures: Advances, Hybridizations, and Applications , 2010 .

[11]  Tunchan Cura,et al.  Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio optimization , 2009 .

[12]  Chih-Chung Lo,et al.  Markowitz-based portfolio selection with cardinality constraints using improved particle swarm optimization , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Celso C. Ribeiro,et al.  Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedures , 2003, Handbook of Metaheuristics.

[14]  S.M.T. Fatemi Ghomi,et al.  Cardinality Constrained Portfolio Optimization Using a Hybrid Approach Based on Particle Swarm Optimization and Hopfield Neural Network , 2012 .