The influence of alarm timing on braking response and driver trust in low speed driving

Forward collision warning systems (FCWS) have been developed to reduce collision accidents caused by driver inattention. The timing of the alarm is a crucial factor in the determination of system effectiveness and in order to achieve the potential benefits it is necessary to estimate the effects of alarm timing on driver behaviour in all driving scenarios. In this study, we focused on driver behaviour when driving at relatively low speed (30 mile/h) and investigated the effect of alarm timing and driving demand on driver braking strategy in imminent collision situations. Three kinds of alarm timing condition (early alarms, late alarms, and no alarms) and two levels of driving demands (high and low decelerations of a leading vehicle) were considered and driver response to alarms was investigated from the viewpoint of driver trust. The results support the following conclusions. Trust in early alarms is higher than that in late alarms regardless of the differences in deceleration of the leading vehicle. In situations where the leading vehicle decreases its speed rapidly, an early alarm timing induces more timely and consistent braking actions than a late alarm timing. In situations where the leading vehicle decreases its speed gently an early alarm timing is unlikely to improve driver performance. Drivers who experience late alarms tend to respond to the brakes before an alarm sounds, moreover a late alarm timing has the potential to impair driver trust due to a conflict between driver expectation and alarm performance. Finally, evidence indicating a relationship between trust and alarm timing is discussed.

[1]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[2]  G. Abe,et al.  The Effect of Alarm Timing on Trust and Driver Behaviour , 2003 .

[3]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN ISSUES FOR CRASH AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[4]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[5]  David Woods,et al.  The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management , 1995 .

[6]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[7]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[8]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[9]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS) , 1992 .

[10]  John Richardson,et al.  The effect of alarm timing on driver behaviour: an investigation of differences in driver trust and response to alarms according to alarm timing , 2004 .

[11]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[12]  Håkan Alm,et al.  Impact and acceptance , 1993 .

[13]  Andrew M. Parkes,et al.  Driving Future Vehicles , 1993 .

[14]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Forward-Looking Collision Warning System Performance Guidelines , 1997 .

[15]  Ben Sidaway,et al.  Time-to-Collision Estimation in a Simulated Driving Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Barry H. Kantowitz IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS : PREMISES, PROMISES, AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[17]  James P Bliss,et al.  Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  W B Verwey,et al.  Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  N. Moray,et al.  Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. , 2000 .

[20]  Alison Smiley,et al.  Driver support , 1993 .

[21]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis , 2000 .

[22]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  PERCEPTUAL AND COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[23]  Nitin Gupta,et al.  The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: An investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[25]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short- and Long-Term Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[26]  John A. Michon,et al.  Generic intelligent drive support , 1993 .

[27]  G Nirschl,et al.  Towards a system architecture of driver’s warning assistant , 1993 .

[28]  Håkan Alm,et al.  INCIDENT WARNING SYSTEMS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PORTICO AND MELYSSA TEST SITE SYSTEMS , 2000 .