Physical Modelling on Detecting Buried Object Using Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI)

This study focused on the evaluation of electrical resistivity method (ERM) for buried object detection and its relationship due to the different stiffness of material. In the past, the conventional method to detect the buried structure was face some limitation due to the time and cost. For example, previous approach related to the trial and error excavation has always expose to some risky outcome due to the uncertainties of the buried object location. Hence, this study introduced an alternative technique with particular reference to resistivity method to detect and evaluate the buried object with different strength of stiffness. The experiment was performed based on field miniature model (small scale study) using soil trial embankment made by lateritic soil and various concrete cube strengths (grade 20, 25 and 30) representing buried object with different conditions. 2D electrical resistivity test (electrical resistivity imaging) was perform using ABEM Terrameter SAS4000 during the data acquisition while the raw data was process using RES2DINV software. It was found that the electrical resistivity method was able to detect the buried concrete structures targeted based on the contrast of the electrical resistivity image produced. Moreover, three different strength of concrete cube were able to be differentiated based on the electrical resistivity values (ERV) obtained. This study found that the ERV of concrete cube for grade 20, 25 and 30 were 170 Ωm, 227 Ωm and 503 Ωm, respectively. Hence, this study shows that the ERV has a strong relationship with different stiffness of material thus applicable to be a useful alternative tool in underground structure detection.

[1]  M. Loke Electrical Imaging Surveys for Environmental and Engineering Studies , 2022 .

[2]  Fayçal Rejiba,et al.  Correlations between geotechnical and electrical data: A case study at Garchy in France , 2006 .

[3]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[4]  Stanislav Mareš,et al.  Introduction to Applied Geophysics , 1984 .

[5]  C. Strobbia,et al.  Geophysical characterisation of a rockslide in an alpine region , 2003 .

[6]  David F. McCarthy,et al.  Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations: Basic Geotechnics , 1982 .

[7]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2-D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[8]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  The influence of soil moisture content and grain size characteristics on its field electrical resistivity , 2013 .

[9]  O. Popoola,et al.  ESTIMATION OFAVERAGE LEACHATE VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM LAPITE PUBLIC DUMP SITE, IBADAN, USING ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD , 2014 .

[10]  Shallow Seismic Refraction, Two-Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Imaging, and Ground Penetrating Radar for Imaging the Ancient Monuments at the Western Shore of Old Luxor City, Egypt , 2014 .

[11]  M. Camarda,et al.  Diffuse soil CO2 degassing from Linosa island. , 2014 .

[12]  English Speaking,et al.  The College of Engineering , 2011 .

[13]  F. Ahmad,et al.  Correlation Analysis Between Field Electrical Resistivity Value (ERV) and Basic Geotechnical Properties (BGP) , 2014, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.

[14]  Sunil Sharma,et al.  SLOPE STABILITY AND STABILIZATION METHODS , 1996 .

[15]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  Soil resistivity influence due to the different utilization of electrical resistivity array , 2013 .

[16]  Rosli Saad,et al.  The 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) study for civil and geotechnical engineering purposes , 2011 .

[17]  Hung I. Lin,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography applied to groundwater aquifer at downstream of Chih-Ben Creek basin, Taiwan , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[18]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  The Influence of Electrical Resistivity Array on its Soil Electrical Resistivity Value , 2014 .

[19]  K. A. N. Adiat,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based elementary multi criteria decision analysis as a spatial prediction tool – A case of predicting potential zones of sustainable groundwater resources , 2012 .

[20]  H. Mauritsch,et al.  Geophysical investigations of large landslides in the Carnic Region of southern Austria , 2000 .

[21]  Mohamad Faizal Tajul Baharuddin,et al.  Groundwater Seepage Mapping Using Electrical Resistivity Imaging , 2015 .

[22]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Geology and geophysics at the archeological park of Vulci (central Italy) , 2014 .

[23]  V. Rinaldi,et al.  Ohmic Conductivity of a Compacted Silty Clay , 2002 .

[24]  M. Cozzolino,et al.  Resistivity Tomography Imaging of the Substratum of the Bedestan Monumental Complex at Nicosia, Cyprus , 2014 .

[25]  R. Barker,et al.  Rapid least-squared inversion of apparent resisitivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method , 1996 .

[26]  Andy Fourie,et al.  Mapping of Leachate Plums at Two Landfill Sites in South Africa Using Geoelectrical Imaging Techniques , 2003 .

[27]  R. Bachus,et al.  Sustainable development and energy geotechnology — Potential roles for geotechnical engineering , 2011 .