Shifting structural complexity: The production of clause types in speeches given by English for academic purposes students

Abstract This paper reports on the structural complexity in oral “sentences” produced by English L2 (ESL) learners (n = 66) during 227 two-minute topic-based monologues in an EAP across three academic semesters. The 5,056 clauses in these ESL speeches were coded by clause type (main, coordinate, adverbial, relative, complement-taking predicate, nonfinite) to determine what types are produced as learners complexify their speech. This study is unique in that it examines all clause types produced during an ESL speaking task across three proficiency levels in an EAP. The results revealed that the learners produced increasingly complex language as measured by subordination, and that the clause types employed to complexify the speeches changed across instruction levels. Adverbial clauses were the most common subordinate clause at the lowest proficiency level, but nonfinite clauses became the most common dependent clause type at the high-intermediate level and were increasingly produced. This description of the clause types found in free-production speeches suggests a developmental order for the clause types in EAP contexts: adverbial, nonfinite, relative, complement-taking predicate clause. These findings, which show that learners produce nonfinite constructions perhaps earlier than expected, can inform curriculum design, instruction approach, and future studies of the development of L2 linguistic complexity.

[1]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  The Acquisition of Complex Sentences: Conclusion , 2004 .

[2]  Shelley Staples,et al.  Predicting Patterns of Grammatical Complexity Across Language Exam Task Types and Proficiency Levels , 2016 .

[3]  Judit Kormos,et al.  Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Task-based L2 Research: Toward More Developmentally Based Measures of Second Language Acquisition , 2014 .

[4]  Peter Collins,et al.  English grammar : an introduction , 2000 .

[5]  Katrien Deroey,et al.  What they highlight is…: The discourse functions of basic wh-clefts in lectures , 2012 .

[6]  S. Thompson,et al.  The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English , 1991 .

[7]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or : Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements , 2001 .

[8]  William O’Grady,et al.  Relative clauses Processing and acquisition * , 2011 .

[9]  Jean Parkinson,et al.  Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students , 2014 .

[10]  N. Rescher Complexity: A Philosophical Overview , 1998 .

[11]  Heike Behrens,et al.  Dynamic systems theory and a usage based approach to second language development , 2011 .

[12]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness , 2010 .

[13]  Holger Diessel,et al.  The Acquisition of Complex Sentences , 2004 .

[14]  Elastic ‘I think’: Stretching Over L1 and L2 , 2016 .

[15]  A. Sheldon The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[16]  K. Fordyce The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance , 2014 .

[17]  Gunther Kaltenböck The Verb Phrase in English: The development of comment clauses , 2013 .

[18]  F. Boers,et al.  Experimental and Intervention Studies on Formulaic Sequences in a Second Language , 2012, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[19]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Lexical verbs in academic discourse: a corpus-driven study of learner use , 2009 .

[20]  Ali Kazemi An investigation into the relationship between the type of self-repair and structural complexity of utterances , 2011 .

[21]  Sidney Greenbaum,et al.  A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English , 1973 .

[22]  J. Milton,et al.  Qualification and Certainty in L1 and L2 Students' Writing , 1997 .

[23]  Wayne Rimmer,et al.  Measuring grammatical complexity: the Gordian knot , 2006 .

[24]  J. Norris,et al.  Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity , 2009 .

[25]  Gerald Graff,et al.  They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing , 2006 .

[26]  Linxiu Yang Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse , 2011 .

[27]  Holger Diessel,et al.  Construction Grammar and First Language Acquisition , 2013 .

[28]  S. Thompson “Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account , 2002 .

[29]  M. Vercellotti,et al.  Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit: Examining fluency, complexity, accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts , 2016 .

[30]  Judit Kormos,et al.  The Role of Task Complexity, Modality, and Aptitude in Narrative Task Performance , 2012 .

[31]  D. E. McCormick,et al.  Examining the Impact of Self‐Correction Notes on Grammatical Accuracy in Speaking , 2013 .

[32]  Rae L Mancilla,et al.  An Investigation of Native and Nonnative English Speakers' Levels of Written Syntactic Complexity in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2017 .

[33]  Anne Margaret Smith,et al.  Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels , 2007 .

[34]  Wayne Rimmer Putting Grammatical Complexity in Context. , 2008 .

[35]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  Linking intonation units in spoken English , 1988 .

[36]  Jean Parkinson,et al.  Adopting academic values: Student use of that-complement clauses in academic writing , 2013 .

[37]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Comparing Native and Learner Perspectives on English Grammar:A Study of Complement Clauses , 2014 .

[38]  Sali A. Tagliamonte,et al.  No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects , 2005, English Language and Linguistics.

[39]  H. Ying Relevance mapping: a study of second language learners’ processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences in English , 2004 .

[40]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  Second language fluency: speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior , 2015 .

[41]  WeiWei Yang,et al.  Response to Biber, Gray, and Poonpon (2011). , 2013 .

[42]  Tony McEnery,et al.  Epistemic Stance in Spoken L2 English: The Effect of Task and Speaker Style , 2017 .

[43]  L. Ortega Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. , 2003 .

[44]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  A Second Look at T-Unit Analysis: Reconsidering the Sentence , 1992 .

[45]  V. M. Holmes A crosslinguistic comparison of the production of utterances in discourse , 1995, Cognition.

[46]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development , 2011 .

[47]  Alan Tonkyn,et al.  Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons , 2000 .