Concurrent Student-Managed Discussions in a Large Class.

Abstract Is it feasible to hold concurrent, small-group, peer-managed discussions in large elementary school classes? We sought an initial answer to this question in a fifth-grade class in Hefei, China. The 52 students in the class were divided into seven small groups. The seven groups held four simultaneous discussions without immediate supervision or guidance from the teacher. The discussions employed the Collaborative Reasoning format, which is designed to promote children's skills of argument as well as skills of discussion management. Analysis of videos and transcripts of the discussions of two groups showed that a core sequence of rhetorical moves characteristic of argumentation emerged in the children's talk. In terms of social dynamics, the two groups had different developmental trends across discussions, perhaps because of the contrasting styles of the emergent child leaders of the groups. Students who experienced Collaborative Reasoning wrote essays with better-developed arguments than comparable children who did not experience Collaborative Reasoning. Responses to a survey showed that the students held positive attitudes toward small-group discussions in the Collaborative Reasoning format because they liked the opportunity to reason together as a team.

[1]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[2]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Children's Discussion Groups , 2007 .

[3]  Lyn Richards,et al.  Using NVIVO in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[4]  Robyn M. Gillies,et al.  Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups , 2003 .

[5]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion , 2001 .

[6]  Kevin Miller,et al.  Let SMIL be your umbrella: Software tools for transcribing, coding, and presenting digital video in behavioral research , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Harry Torrance,et al.  The development and consequences of national curriculum assessment for primary education in England , 2009 .

[8]  Cary J. Roseth,et al.  Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Cooperative Learning: Prevalence, Conceptualizations, and the Relation Between Research and Practice , 1998 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument , 2001 .

[11]  Neville Bennett.  Class Size in Primary Schools: perceptions of headteachers, chairs of governors, teachers and parents , 1996 .

[12]  B P O'Connor,et al.  Simple and flexible SAS and SPSS programs for analyzing lag-sequential categorical data , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Martha Waggoner.  Collaborative Reasoning about Stories. , 1995 .

[14]  Linda R. Valli,et al.  The Changing Roles of Teachers in an Era of High-Stakes Accountability , 2007 .

[15]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Aligning Academic Task and Participation Status through Revoicing: Analysis of a Classroom Discourse Strategy , 1993 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning , 1998, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  Karen K. Lind.  A Trip to the Zoo. , 1995 .

[18]  P. Kutnick,et al.  Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work , 2003 .

[19]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts , 2008 .

[20]  N. Mercer,et al.  Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning , 2003 .

[21]  John A. Zahorik.  Reducing Class Size Leads to Individualized Instruction , 1999 .

[22]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[23]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  A More Complete Picture of School Resource Policies , 1996 .

[24]  Clotilde Pontecorvo,et al.  Children's Talk in Classroom Discussions , 1992 .

[25]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory , 1996 .

[26]  Shlomo Sharan.  Large classes, small groups: a social systems approach , 2003 .

[27]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation , 2005 .

[28]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Student and Teacher Development in More and Less Proficient Discussions of Literature , 2001 .

[29]  Leonard S. Cahen.  Class size and instruction , 1984 .

[30]  Marilyn J. Chambliss,et al.  Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. , 1995 .

[31]  Jean Osborn,et al.  Literacy for All: Issues in Teaching and Learning. , 1998 .

[32]  R. Gillies.  Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms , 2003 .

[33]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding Ways for Children to Talk and Think in School , 2003 .

[34]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[35]  D. Walton.  Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[36]  Brigid Barron,et al.  Problem Solving in Video-based Microworlds: Collaborative and Individual Outcomes of High-Achieving Sixth-Grade Students. , 2000 .

[37]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Collaborative Reasoning in China and Korea , 2008 .

[38]  Merrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .

[39]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[40]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Class Size and Student Achievement: Small Effects of Small Classes , 1989 .

[41]  C. Kardash,et al.  The Effects of Goal Instructions and Text on the Generation of Counterarguments During Writing. , 2005 .

[42]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .

[43]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Small-Group Reflections: Parallels Between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups , 2006 .