Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics

Background and purpose Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. Material and methods A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). Results For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. Conclusion An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation.

[1]  Marta Paiusco,et al.  Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[2]  Andrew Nisbet,et al.  Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Independent knowledge-based treatment planning QA to audit Pinnacle autoplanning. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  Binbin Wu,et al.  An overlap-volume-histogram based method for rectal dose prediction and automated treatment planning in the external beam prostate radiotherapy following hydrogel injection. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  Jiawei Fan,et al.  Automatic treatment planning based on three‐dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique , 2018, Medical physics.

[7]  J. Lo,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Riccardo Calandrino,et al.  Knowledge-based automatic optimization of adaptive early-regression-guided VMAT for rectal cancer. , 2020, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[10]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Evaluation of plan quality assurance models for prostate cancer patients based on fully automatically generated Pareto-optimal treatment plans , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Iori Sumida,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[12]  Todd McNutt,et al.  A quality control model that uses PTV-rectal distances to predict the lowest achievable rectum dose, improves IMRT planning for patients with prostate cancer. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Hao Wu,et al.  A dosimetric evaluation of knowledge‐based VMAT planning with simultaneous integrated boosting for rectal cancer patients , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[14]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Prospective clinical validation of independent DVH prediction for plan QA in automatic treatment planning for prostate cancer patients. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[16]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer , 2014, Radiation Oncology.

[17]  Ana Vaniqui,et al.  What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A Shape Relationship Descriptor for Radiation Therapy Planning , 2009, MICCAI.

[19]  B. Slotman,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R Calandrino,et al.  Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[21]  Binbin Wu,et al.  Improved robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy plan quality and planning efficacy for organ-confined prostate cancer utilizing overlap-volume histogram-driven planning methodology. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Yibing Wang,et al.  Knowledge‐based dose prediction models for head and neck cancer are strongly affected by interorgan dependency and dataset inconsistency , 2018, Medical physics.

[25]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Accurate prediction of target dose-escalation and organ-at-risk dose levels for non-small cell lung cancer patients. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.