Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: Can acceleration be used in interception?

To investigate whether visual judgments of acceleration could be used for intercepting moving targets, we determined how well subjects can detect acceleration when the presentation time is short. In a differential judgment task, two dots were presented successively. One dot accelerated and the other decelerated. Subjects had to indicate which of the two accelerated. In an absolute judgment task, subjects had to adjust the motion of a dot so that it appeared to move at a constant velocity. The results for the two tasks were similar. For most subjects, we could determine a detection threshold even when the presentation time was only 300 msec. However, an analysis of these thresholds suggests that subjects did not detect the acceleration itself but that they detected that a target had accelerated on the basis of the change in velocity between the beginning and the end of the presentation. A change of about 25% was needed to detect acceleration with reasonable confidence. Perhaps the simplest use of acceleration for interception consists of distinguishing between acceleration and deceleration of the optic projection of an approaching ball to determine whether one has to run backward or forward to catch it. We examined the results of a real ball-catching task (Oudejans, Michaels, & Bakker, 1997) and found that subjects reacted before acceleration could have been detected. We conclude that acceleration is not used in this simple manner to intercept moving targets.

[1]  S. Runeson,et al.  Constant velocity — Not perceived as such , 1974, Psychological research.

[2]  R. Gottsdanker,et al.  Identifying the acceleration of visual targets. , 1961, British journal of psychology.

[3]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[4]  Seville Chapman Catching a Baseball , 1968 .

[5]  J L Dannemiller,et al.  Role of image acceleration in judging landing location of free-falling projectiles. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  R. Gellman,et al.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Manual interception of moving targets I. Performance and movement initiation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  E Brenner,et al.  Detecting Changes in One's Own Velocity from the Optic Flow , 1994, Perception.

[9]  E Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving objects. The dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[10]  John F. Schmerler The Visual Perception of Accelerated Motion , 1976, Perception.

[11]  M K Kaiser,et al.  How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. , 1995, Science.

[12]  E. Brenner,et al.  The difference between the perception of absolute and relative motion: a reaction time study , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Phillip J. Bairstow,et al.  Analysis of hand movement to moving targets , 1987 .

[15]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The effects of baseball experience on movement initiation in catching fly balls. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  D. Rosenbaum Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. , 1975 .