Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches

With the demand for, and scale of, ecological restoration increasing globally, effectiveness monitoring remains a significant challenge. For forest restoration, structural complexity is a recognised indicator of ecosystem biodiversity and in turn a surrogate for restoration effectiveness. Structural complexity captures the diversity in vegetation elements, from tree height to species composition, and the layering of these elements is critical for dependent organisms which rely upon them for their survival. Traditional methods of measuring structural complexity are costly and time-consuming, resulting in a discrepancy between the scales of ‘available’ versus ‘needed’ information. With advancements in both sensors and platforms, there exists an unprecedented opportunity for landscape-level effectiveness monitoring using remote sensing. We here review the key literature on passive (e.g., optical) and active (e.g., LiDAR) sensors and their available platforms (spaceborne to unmanned aerial vehicles) used to capture structural attributes at the tree- and stand-level relevant for effectiveness monitoring. Good cross-validation between remotely sensed and ground truthed data has been shown for many traditional attributes, but remote sensing offers opportunities for assessment of novel or difficult to measure attributes. While there are examples of the application of such technologies in forestry and conservation ecology, there are few reports of remote sensing for monitoring the effectiveness of ecological restoration actions in reversing land degradation. Such monitoring requires baseline data for the restoration site as well as benchmarking the trajectory of remediation against the structural complexity of a reference system.

[1]  P. Rich Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. , 1990 .

[2]  Jeffrey K. Gillan,et al.  Interpretation of high-resolution imagery for detecting vegetation cover composition change after fuels reduction treatments in woodlands , 2014 .

[3]  Molly K Reif,et al.  Remote sensing for restoration ecology: Application for restoring degraded, damaged, transformed, or destroyed ecosystems , 2017, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[4]  Francesco Fava,et al.  Mapping Changes in Land Cover Composition and Pattern for Comparing Mediterranean Rangeland Restoration Alternatives , 2016 .

[5]  Assessment of crown woody biomass in Eucalyptus grandis and E. globulus plantations , 2017, New Forests.

[6]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  The Ridgefield Multiple Ecosystem Services Experiment: Can restoration of former agricultural land achieve multiple outcomes? , 2012 .

[7]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[8]  Thomas Udelhoven,et al.  The influence of scan mode and circle fitting on tree stem detection, stem diameter and volume extraction from terrestrial laser scans , 2013 .

[9]  J. Reitberger,et al.  3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data , 2009 .

[10]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[11]  Yi Lin,et al.  A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements , 2010 .

[12]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Assessment of the Repeatability of Automatic Forest Inventory Metrics Derived From UAV-Borne Laser Scanning Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[14]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Canopy Structural Changes Following Widespread Mortality of Canopy Dominant Trees , 2013 .

[15]  A. J.,et al.  Measurements of the soil microbial community for estimating the success of restoration , 2003 .

[16]  I. Daliakopoulos,et al.  Tree Crown Detection on Multispectral VHR Satellite Imagery , 2009 .

[17]  J. Griffith,et al.  SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration , 2013 .

[18]  S. Lambot,et al.  Full-wave inversion of ground-penetrating radar data for forest litter characterization , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[19]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Using lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor tropical forest recovery , 2015 .

[20]  E. Næsset Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[21]  Philip Gibbons,et al.  An overview of methods used to assess vegetation condition at the scale of the site , 2006 .

[22]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Restoring forests: regeneration and ecosystem function for the future , 2019, New Forests.

[23]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Avoiding the Old Pitfalls: Opportunities in a New Discipline , 1994 .

[24]  Fabio Meloni,et al.  Direct Measurement of Tree Height Provides Different Results on the Assessment of LiDAR Accuracy , 2016 .

[25]  Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri,et al.  Extreme Wave Height Events in NW Spain: A Combined Multi-Sensor and Model Approach , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Christian Ammer,et al.  Quantifying stand structural complexity and its relationship with forest management, tree species diversity and microclimate , 2017 .

[27]  H. Turral,et al.  The state of the world's land and water resources for food and agriculture : managing systems at risk , 2011 .

[28]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Comparing small-footprint lidar and forest inventory data for single strata biomass estimation - A case study over a multi-layered mediterranean forest , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[29]  P. Gibbons,et al.  An objective and quantitative methodology for constructing an index of stand structural complexity , 2006 .

[30]  P. Meyer,et al.  Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves , 2005 .

[31]  D. Seidel A holistic approach to determine tree structural complexity based on laser scanning data and fractal analysis , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[32]  Benjamin O. Knapp,et al.  Floristic Quality Index for woodland ground flora restoration: Utility and effectiveness in a fire-managed landscape , 2016 .

[33]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[34]  Vanni Nardino,et al.  Estimation of canopy attributes in beech forests using true colour digital images from a small fixed-wing UAV , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[35]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success , 2005 .

[36]  Douglas J. King,et al.  Mapping dead wood distribution in a temperate hardwood forest using high resolution airborne imagery , 2009 .

[37]  George P. Petropoulos,et al.  Hyperion hyperspectral imagery analysis combined with machine learning classifiers for land use/cover mapping , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  R. A. Hill,et al.  Living on the edge: utilising lidar data to assess the importance of vegetation structure for avian diversity in fragmented woodlands and their edges , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Paulo Mesquita,et al.  Biomass estimation with high resolution satellite images: A case study of Quercus rotundifolia , 2015 .

[40]  Ned Horning,et al.  Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak , 2017 .

[42]  H. Nagendra,et al.  Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats , 2013 .

[43]  The role of reforestation in carbon sequestration , 2017, New Forests.

[44]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  Remote sensing platforms and sensors: A survey , 2016 .

[45]  Robert S. Nuske,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) to Quantify Spatial Gap Patterns in Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[46]  Karin Schiegg,et al.  Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity , 2000 .

[47]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Mapping habitat suitability for at-risk plant species and its implications for restoration and reintroduction. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  A. Gonsamo,et al.  Measuring fractional forest canopy element cover and openness - definitions and methodologies revisited , 2013 .

[49]  L. Hubert‐Moy,et al.  Identification and mapping of natural vegetation on a coastal site using a Worldview-2 satellite image. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Assessing forest windthrow damage using single-date, post-event airborne laser scanning data , 2018 .

[51]  C. Gough,et al.  Forest Canopy Structural Complexity and Light Absorption Relationships at the Subcontinental Scale , 2018 .

[52]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Detection of fallen trees in ALS point clouds using a Normalized Cut approach trained by simulation , 2015 .

[53]  William M. Block,et al.  Design and Implementation of Monitoring Studies to Evaluate the Success of Ecological Restoration on Wildlife , 2001 .

[54]  F. Rovero,et al.  Integrating field and satellite data for spatially explicit inference on the density of threatened arboreal primates. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[55]  Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,et al.  Deriving comprehensive forest structure information from mobile laser scanning observations using automated point cloud classification , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[56]  Takeshi Sasaki,et al.  Evaluating restoration success of a 40-year-old urban forest in reference to mature natural forest , 2018 .

[57]  Peter Haase,et al.  A suite of essential biodiversity variables for detecting critical biodiversity change , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[58]  P. Corona,et al.  Quantitative changes of forest landscapes over the last century across Italy , 2018 .

[59]  Peter Annighöfer,et al.  From tree to stand-level structural complexity — Which properties make a forest stand complex? , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[60]  L. Xiaobing,et al.  A Model for Simulating the Soil Organic Carbon Pool of Steppe Ecosystems , 2016, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[61]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[62]  Brady S. Hardiman,et al.  Canopy-structure effects on surface roughness parameters: Observations in a Great Lakes mixed-deciduous forest , 2013 .

[63]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[64]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes , 2000 .

[65]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  Evaluating EO1-Hyperion capability for mapping conifer and broadleaved forests , 2016 .

[66]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Hierarchical Approach to Three-Dimensional Segmentation of LiDAR Data at Single-Tree Level in a Multilayered Forest , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[67]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Detection of windthrown trees using airborne laser scanning , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[68]  R. Furrer,et al.  Forest canopy-structure characterization: A data-driven approach , 2015 .

[69]  P. Gong,et al.  Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data , 2007, Journal of Forest Research.

[70]  Owen F Price,et al.  The potential for LiDAR technology to map fire fuel hazard over large areas of Australian forest. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[71]  S. Dech,et al.  Assessing Forest Cover Dynamics and Forest Perception in the Atlantic Forest of Paraguay, Combining Remote Sensing and Household Level Data , 2017 .

[72]  C. Messier,et al.  Exploring trees in three dimensions: VoxR, a novel voxel-based R package dedicated to analysing the complex arrangement of tree crowns , 2018, Annals of botany.

[73]  C. Gleason,et al.  A Review of Remote Sensing of Forest Biomass and Biofuel: Options for Small-Area Applications , 2011 .

[74]  D. Cormier,et al.  Potential of Multi-Temporal Uav-Borne LIDAR in Assessing Effectiveness of Silvicultural Treatments , 2017 .

[75]  Yvette L. Dickinson,et al.  Have we been successful? Monitoring horizontal forest complexity for forest restoration projects , 2016 .

[76]  D. King,et al.  Forest complexity modelling and mapping with remote sensing and topographic data: a comparison of three methods , 2011 .

[77]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[78]  Salah Sukkarieh,et al.  Multi-class predictive template for tree crown detection , 2012 .

[79]  Robert M. Zink,et al.  Bird species diversity , 1996, Nature.

[80]  R. Chazdon Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded Lands , 2008, Science.

[81]  F. Hosoi,et al.  Automatic individual tree detection and canopy segmentation from three-dimensional point cloud images obtained from ground-based lidar , 2018 .

[82]  Nikolay S. Strigul,et al.  Augmentation of Traditional Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning with Unmanned Aerial Systems and Photogrammetry for Forest Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[83]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Comparison of high-density LiDAR and satellite photogrammetry for forest inventory , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[84]  Jonathon J. Valente,et al.  Corridors restore animal-mediated pollination in fragmented tropical forest landscapes , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[85]  Mark W. Chynoweth,et al.  Remote sensing for restoration planning: how the big picture can inform stakeholders , 2017 .

[87]  Mark C. Vanderwel,et al.  Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes , 2016, Global change biology.

[88]  M. d'Oliveira,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning lidar in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon , 2012 .

[89]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Fusion of airborne LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for aboveground and belowground forest biomass estimation , 2017 .

[90]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Phenotyping Whole Forests Will Help to Track Genetic Performance. , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[91]  Maciej Lisiewicz,et al.  Species-related single dead tree detection using multi-temporal ALS data and CIR imagery , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[92]  Laurie A. Chisholm,et al.  Classification of Australian Native Forest Species Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Machine-Learning Classification Algorithms , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[93]  H. Possingham,et al.  Habitat structure is more important than vegetation composition for local‐level management of native terrestrial reptile and small mammal species living in urban remnants: A case study from Brisbane, Australia , 2007, Austral ecology.

[94]  OPERATIONALIZING THE USE OF LIDAR IN FOREST RESOURCE INVENTORIES: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL POINT DENSITY? , 2010 .

[95]  C. Echeverría,et al.  Ecological indicators for assessing ecological success of forest restoration: a world review , 2017 .

[96]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades , 2015 .

[97]  Daniel S Falster,et al.  Testing the generality of above‐ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale , 2016, Global change biology.

[98]  Jungho Im,et al.  Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches , 2012 .

[99]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Remote sensing of structural complexity indices for habitat and species distribution modeling. , 2010 .

[100]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Forest structure in space and time: Biotic and abiotic determinants of canopy complexity and their effects on net primary productivity , 2018 .

[101]  John J. A. Ingram,et al.  Mapping tropical forest structure in southeastern Madagascar using remote sensing and artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[102]  J. Aronson,et al.  Evaluating success of various restorative interventions through drone‐ and field‐collected data, using six putative framework species in Argentinian Patagonia , 2019, Restoration Ecology.

[103]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis of Downed Logs in Disturbed Forested Landscapes Using Lidar , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[104]  Raf Aerts,et al.  Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2011, BMC Ecology.

[105]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest with vertical foliage, using cover and fullframe fisheye photography , 2007 .

[106]  E. Næsset,et al.  Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[107]  D. A. Keith,et al.  Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia , 2003 .

[108]  S. Popescu,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass : A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers , 2009 .

[109]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[110]  S. Phinn,et al.  Measuring plot scale woodland structure using terrestrial laser scanning , 2018 .

[111]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[112]  T. Sankey,et al.  UAV hyperspectral and lidar data and their fusion for arid and semi‐arid land vegetation monitoring , 2018 .

[113]  Juha Suomalainen,et al.  Mapping the Leaf Economic Spectrum across West African Tropical Forests Using UAV-Acquired Hyperspectral Imagery , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[114]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Quantitative analysis of woodpecker habitat using high-resolution airborne LiDAR estimates of forest structure and composition , 2014 .

[115]  Andre Zerger,et al.  Mapping vegetation condition in the context of biodiversity conservation , 2006 .

[116]  M. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[117]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data , 2016 .

[118]  Ying Jiang,et al.  Discussion on Remote Sensing Big Data to Promote the Development of Smart City , 2020 .

[119]  E. Gonzales,et al.  Restoration of the DIII-D solenoid , 1997 .

[120]  Costs of delayed reforestation and failure to reforest , 2018, New Forests.

[121]  Caixia Liu,et al.  Quantifying Multi-Decadal Change of Planted Forest Cover Using Airborne LiDAR and Landsat Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[122]  Tanya G. Bailey Plantings for carbon, biodiversity and restoration in dry rural landscapes , 2013 .

[123]  David E. Hibbs,et al.  A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. , 2000 .

[124]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[125]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Applying an animal‐centric approach to improve ecological restoration , 2016 .

[126]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[127]  Di Wang,et al.  Terrestrial Structure from Motion Photogrammetry for Deriving Forest Inventory Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[128]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Mapping tree height distributions in Sub-Saharan Africa using Landsat 7 and 8 data , 2016 .

[129]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Image texture as a remotely sensed measure of vegetation structure , 2012 .

[130]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Can airborne laser scanning assist in mapping and monitoring natural forests , 2016 .

[131]  Y. Lü,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functional Enhancement by Forest Restoration: A Meta‐analysis in China , 2017 .

[132]  M. Machmer,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING GUIDELINES FOR ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION , 2002 .

[133]  Bin Wu,et al.  Individual tree crown delineation using localized contour tree method and airborne LiDAR data in coniferous forests , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[134]  S. Goetz,et al.  A meta-analysis of terrestrial aboveground biomass estimation using lidar remote sensing , 2013 .

[135]  Phillip B. Gibbons,et al.  Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement , 2005 .

[136]  NASER EL-SHEIMY Emerging MEMS IMU and Its Impact on Mapping Applications , 2009 .

[137]  M. Cherry,et al.  Allometric relationships between stem variables and leaf area in planted Eucalyptus nitens and naturally regenerating Acacia dealbata , 1999 .

[138]  Andrew Seidl,et al.  Time, space, place, and the Bonn Challenge global forest restoration target , 2017 .

[139]  Holly K. Gibbs,et al.  Mapping the world's degraded lands , 2015 .

[140]  H. Sitters,et al.  Mammal functional diversity increases with vegetation structural complexity in two forest types , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[141]  P. Ódor,et al.  Stand structural drivers of microclimate in mature temperate mixed forests , 2017 .

[142]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Estimating biomass in Hedmark County, Norway using national forest inventory field plots and airborne laser scanning , 2012 .

[143]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Autonomous Collection of Forest Field Reference - The Outlook and a First Step with UAV Laser Scanning , 2017, Remote. Sens..