Jan using hospital mortality data performance of surgical units : validation study Mortality control charts for comparing

Abstract Objective: To design and validate a statistical method for evaluating the performance of surgical units that adjusts for case volume and case mix. Design: Validation study using routinely collected data on in-hospital mortality. Data sources: Two UK databases, the ASCOT prospective database and the risk scoring collaborative (RISC) database, covering 1042 patients undergoing surgery in 29 hospitals for gastro-oesophageal cancer between 1995 and 2000. Statistical analysis: A two level hierarchical logistic regression model was used to adjust each unit's operative mortality for case mix. Crude or adjusted operative mortality was plotted on mortality control charts (a graphical representation of surgical performance) as a function of number of operations. Control limits defined as 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals identified units whose performance diverged significantly from the mean. Results: The mean in-hospital mortality was 12% (range 0% to 50%). The case volume of the units ranged from one to 55 cases a year. When crude figures were plotted on the mortality control chart, four units lay outside the 90% control limit, including two outside the 95% limit. When operative mortality was adjusted for risk, three units lay outside the 90% limit and one outside the 95% limit. The model fitted the data well and had adequate discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.78). Conclusions: The mortality control chart is an accurate, risk adjusted means of identifying units whose surgical performance, in terms of operative mortality, diverges significantly from the population mean. It gives an early warning of divergent performance. It could be adapted to monitor performance across various specialties. What is already known on this topic League tables are an established technique for ranking the performance of organisations such as healthcare providers Mortality control charts are another way to compare the performance of healthcare providers, particularly for outcomes of surgery What this study adds Mortality control charts can be adjusted for case mix and case volume and are better than league tables for monitoring surgical performance Mortality control charts have a “buffer zone” for indicating divergence from the mean mortality and are particularly useful for specialties with a low volume of surgery

[1]  G. P. Copeland,et al.  POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[3]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Multilevel Modelling of Health Statistics , 2002, Technometrics.

[4]  Chris Sherlaw-Johnson,et al.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display , 1997, The Lancet.

[5]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Multilevel modelling of health statistics , 2001 .

[6]  P Littlejohns,et al.  Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  S Gallivan,et al.  Mortality rates after surgery for congenital heart defects in children and surgeons' performance , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Ajani,et al.  Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  C. McConkey,et al.  Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[11]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Commissioned analysis of surgical performance using routine data: lessons from the Bristol inquiry , 2002 .

[12]  P. Mcculloch,et al.  ASCOT: a comprehensive clinical database for gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. , 2001, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  Nicky Best,et al.  Comparison of UK paediatric cardiac surgical performance by analysis of routinely collected data 1984–96: was Bristol an outlier? , 2001, The Lancet.

[14]  Tom Marshall,et al.  Performance league tables: the NHS deserves better , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth rates. , 1998, BMJ.

[16]  Tom Marshall,et al.  Bristol, Shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart's forgotten lessons , 2001, The Lancet.

[17]  S. Pathak The way I see it: Working in the Caribbean in the gap between basic and higher surgical training , 2002 .

[18]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[20]  G. Parry,et al.  Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study , 1998, BMJ.

[21]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Using Examination Results as Indicators of School and College Performance , 1996 .

[22]  S Greenland,et al.  Principles of multilevel modelling. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[24]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .