Selection of brake friction materials using hybrid analytical hierarchy process and vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje approach

Selection of proper formulation is one of the most challenging tasks in the design and development of brake friction materials. Improper selection often leads to premature component or product failure during working. This article develops an evaluation approach based on VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) strengthened with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to choose an optimal friction material formulation according to several performance defining criteria, which are probably conflicting. Friction materials based on the variation of Kevlar–lapinus and lapinus–wollastonite fibers are fabricated and characterized for their physical, chemical, mechanical, and tribological performance. The tribological performance was evaluated on a Krauss type friction tester following R-90 norms as per ECE (Economic Commission for Europe) regulations. Experimental results in-terms of friction performance, fade performance, wear performance, friction stability, recovery performance, friction variability, friction fluctuations, and disc-temperature rise were considered as criterions for performance optimization. The weight of importance for each criterion was determined by AHP, while VIKOR is employed to rank the alternatives. The results show that the formulation with 27.5/2.5 wt% of lapinus/Kevlar fiber combination exhibit optimal properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers

[1]  Guoan Chen,et al.  Optimization on tribological properties of aramid fibre and CaSO4 whisker reinforced non-metallic friction material with analytic hierarchy process and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations , 2010 .

[2]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Optimal design of flyash filled composite friction materials using combined Analytical Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions approach , 2010 .

[3]  Xiongwei Qu,et al.  The effect of steel fiber orientation on frictional properties of asbestos-free friction materials , 2004 .

[4]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Assessment of braking performance of lapinus–wollastonite fibre reinforced friction composite materials , 2017 .

[5]  Tej Singh,et al.  Optimization of tribo-performance of brake friction materials: Effect of nano filler , 2015 .

[6]  Tianxi Liu,et al.  Friction properties of sisal fiber/nano‐silica reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites , 2015 .

[7]  J. Bijwe,et al.  Fade and Recovery Behavior of Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO) Composite Friction Materials based on Combinations of Rock Fibers and Organic Fibers , 2005 .

[8]  Ho Jang,et al.  Synergistic effects of aramid pulp and potassium titanate whiskers in the automotive friction material , 2001 .

[9]  S. Kim,et al.  Optimization of manufacturing parameters for a brake lining using Taguchi method , 2003 .

[10]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Effect of Nanoclay Reinforcement on the Friction Braking Performance of Hybrid Phenolic Friction Composites , 2013, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[11]  A. Patnaik,et al.  FRICTION BRAKING PERFORMANCE OF NANOFILLED HYBRID FIBER REINFORCED PHENOLIC COMPOSITES: INFLUENCE OF NANOCLAY AND CARBON NANOTUBES , 2013 .

[12]  P. Gopal,et al.  Hybrid phenolic friction composites containing Kevlar® pulp Part 1. Enhancement of friction and wear performance☆ , 1996 .

[13]  Jayashree Bijwe,et al.  Composites as friction materials: Recent developments in non‐asbestos fiber reinforced friction materials—a review , 1997 .

[14]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Performance sensitivity of hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking: Effect of ceramic and aramid fibre combination , 2010 .

[15]  J. Bijwe,et al.  Role of different metallic fillers in non-asbestos organic (NAO) friction composites for controlling sensitivity of coefficient of friction to load and speed , 2010 .

[16]  Bhabani K. Satapathy,et al.  Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres: Part II. Optimisation by balancing and ranking using multiple criteria decision model (MCDM) , 2004 .

[17]  Mehrdad Hadipour,et al.  Application of VIKOR and fuzzy AHP for conservation priority assessment in coastal areas: Case of Khuzestan district, Iran , 2014 .

[18]  Yafei Lu A combinatorial approach for automotive friction materials: Combined effects of ingredients on friction performance , 2002 .

[19]  Yansheng Yin,et al.  Effects of Ceramic Fiber on the Friction Performance of Automotive Brake Lining Materials , 2008 .

[20]  Tej Singh,et al.  Performance assessment of lapinus–aramid based brake pad hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking , 2015 .

[21]  Bhabani K. Satapathy,et al.  Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres: Part I. Fade and recovery behaviour , 2004 .

[22]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Thermo‐mechanical and tribological properties of multi‐walled carbon nanotubes filled friction composite materials , 2017 .

[23]  Qihua Wang,et al.  Effect of aspect ratios of aramid fiber on mechanical and tribological behaviors of friction materials , 2015 .

[24]  Tej Singh,et al.  Optimization of tribological properties of cement kiln dust-filled brake pad using grey relation analysis , 2016 .

[25]  Sanjay Kumar Singh,et al.  Identifying Individuals Using Eigenbeat Features of Electrocardiogram , 2013 .

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2009 .

[28]  Kamran Rezaie,et al.  Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP–VIKOR method , 2014 .

[29]  Gwidon Stachowiak,et al.  Review of automotive brake friction materials , 2004 .