Parallel processing of somatosensory information: Evidence from dynamic causal modeling of MEG data

The advent of methods to investigate network dynamics has led to discussion of whether somatosensory inputs are processed in serial or in parallel. Both hypotheses are supported by DCM analyses of fMRI studies. In the present study, we revisited this controversy using DCM on magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data during somatosensory stimulation. Bayesian model comparison was used to allow for direct inference on the processing stream. Additionally we varied the duration of the time-window of analyzed data after the somatosensory stimulus. This approach allowed us to explore time dependent changes in the processing stream of somatosensory information and to evaluate the consistency of results. We found that models favoring a parallel processing route best describe neural activities elicited by somatosensory stimuli. This result was consistent for different time-windows. Although it is assumed that the majority of somatosensory information is delivered to the SI, the current results indicate that at least a small part of somatosensory information is delivered in parallel to the SII. These findings emphasize the importance of data analysis with high temporal resolution.

[1]  Simona Temereanca,et al.  Functional Topography of Corticothalamic Feedback Enhances Thalamic Spatial Response Tuning in the Somatosensory Whisker/Barrel System , 2004, Neuron.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Population dynamics: Variance and the sigmoid activation function , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Sergio Tufik,et al.  Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review , 2004, Brain Research.

[4]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Katiuscia Sacco,et al.  Once you feel it, you see it: Insula and sensory-motor contribution to visual awareness for fearful bodies in parietal neglect , 2015, Cortex.

[7]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Structure predicts function: Combining non-invasive electrophysiology with in-vivo histology , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Differential thalamic relationships of sensory‐motor and parietal cortical fields in monkeys , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  D. Ferrington,et al.  Parallel processing of tactile information in the cerebral cortex of the cat: effect of reversible inactivation of SI on responsiveness of SII neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A Schnitzler,et al.  Different cortical organization of visceral and somatic sensation in humans , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Parallel Processing of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Somatosensory Information in the Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices: Evidence from Dynamic Causal Modeling of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Thalamic connectivity of the second somatosensory area and neighboring somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Neurophysiology and Functional Neuroanatomy of Pain Perception , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[14]  T. Powell,et al.  Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Contralateral cortical connexions. , 1969, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  W. Penny,et al.  Reading Front to Back: MEG Evidence for Early Feedback Effects During Word Recognition , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  M. Herrero,et al.  Functional anatomy of thalamus and basal ganglia , 2002, Child’s Nervous System.

[19]  J. Karhu,et al.  Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling suggests serial processing of tactile vibratory stimuli in the human somatosensory cortex—An fMRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  Rolf-Detlef Treede,et al.  Structural and functional asymmetry in the human parietal opercular cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  F. Blankenburg,et al.  Recurrent Neural Processing and Somatosensory Awareness , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Hari,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  G. M. Murray,et al.  Parallel processing in rabbit first (SI) and second (SII) somatosensory cortical areas: effects of reversible inactivation by cooling of SI on responses in SII. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  R W Guillery,et al.  Patterns of fiber degeneration in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat following lesions in the visual cortex , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  F Mauguière,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain: a dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part II: Effects of stimulus rate, attention and stimulus detection. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  萩原 綱一.  Oscillatory gamma synchronization binds the primary and secondary somatosensory areas in humans , 2010 .

[32]  F Mauguière.  [Clinical neurophysiology and functional neuroimaging at the Société Française de Neurologie (1948-1998)]. , 1999, Revue neurologique.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational Bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  Fernando A. Barrios,et al.  Subjective Somatosensory Experiences Disclosed by Focused Attention: Cortical-Hippocampal-Insular and Amygdala Contributions , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Christian Wallraven,et al.  Intra- and inter-hemispheric effective connectivity in the human somatosensory cortex during pressure stimulation , 2014, BMC Neuroscience.

[36]  John C Gore,et al.  Dependence of BOLD signal change on tactile stimulus intensity in SI of primates. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  M. Rowe,et al.  Parallel processing of tactile information in cat cerebral cortex: effect of reversible inactivation of SII on SI responses. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Distribution of four types of synapse on physiologically identified relay neurons in the ventral posterior thalamic nucleus of the cat , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  Pierre Rainville,et al.  Serial processing in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: A DCM analysis of human fMRI data in response to innocuous and noxious electrical stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Activation of the human posterior parietal and temporoparietal cortices during audiotactile interaction , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  M Mishkin,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of tactual information in somatosensory cortex of rhesus monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Akiyoshi Yamada,et al.  Highly polymorphic DNA markers to specify strains of the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Tricholoma matsutake based on σmarY1, the long terminal repeat of gypsy-type retroelement marY1 , 2005, Mycorrhiza.

[44]  H. Burton,et al.  The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in new world and old world monkeys , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  A. Turman,et al.  PARALLEL ORGANIZATION OF SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL AREAS I AND II FOR TACTILE PROCESSING , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[46]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[47]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Cortical connections of the somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: Evidence for a corticolimbic pathway for touch , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.