Personal discovery in diabetes self-management: Discovering cause and effect using self-monitoring data

OBJECTIVE To outline new design directions for informatics solutions that facilitate personal discovery with self-monitoring data. We investigate this question in the context of chronic disease self-management with the focus on type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted an observational qualitative study of discovery with personal data among adults attending a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program that utilized a discovery-based curriculum. The study included observations of class sessions, and interviews and focus groups with the educator and attendees of the program (n = 14). RESULTS The main discovery in diabetes self-management evolved around discovering patterns of association between characteristics of individuals' activities and changes in their blood glucose levels that the participants referred to as "cause and effect". This discovery empowered individuals to actively engage in self-management and provided a desired flexibility in selection of personalized self-management strategies. We show that discovery of cause and effect involves four essential phases: (1) feature selection, (2) hypothesis generation, (3) feature evaluation, and (4) goal specification. Further, we identify opportunities to support discovery at each stage with informatics and data visualization solutions by providing assistance with: (1) active manipulation of collected data (e.g., grouping, filtering and side-by-side inspection), (2) hypotheses formulation (e.g., using natural language statements or constructing visual queries), (3) inference evaluation (e.g., through aggregation and visual comparison, and statistical analysis of associations), and (4) translation of discoveries into actionable goals (e.g., tailored selection from computable knowledge sources of effective diabetes self-management behaviors). DISCUSSION The study suggests that discovery of cause and effect in diabetes can be a powerful approach to helping individuals to improve their self-management strategies, and that self-monitoring data can serve as a driving engine for personal discovery that may lead to sustainable behavior changes. CONCLUSIONS Enabling personal discovery is a promising new approach to enhancing chronic disease self-management with informatics interventions.

[1]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  The multitasking clinician: Decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Medication Decision-Making on Hospital Ward-Rounds , 2011, MIE.

[4]  Vera D. Khovanskaya,et al.  Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[5]  Arlene E. Chung,et al.  Harnessing person-generated health data to accelerate patient-centered outcomes research: the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America PCORnet Patient Powered Research Network (CCFA Partners) , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  M. Marcus,et al.  Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[7]  C. Clar,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: systematic review. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[8]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Data-driven health management: reasoning about personally generated data in diabetes with information technologies , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Tadej Battelino,et al.  Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes: Recent Studies , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[10]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[11]  Susan L. Zickmund,et al.  Norms of decision making in the ICU: a case study of two academic medical centers at the extremes of end-of-life treatment intensity , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  Betty Brackenridge,et al.  Discovering diabetes: achieving target blood glucose control through a behavioural approach to insulin and food self-management , 2004 .

[13]  Adler J. Perotte,et al.  Learning probabilistic phenotypes from heterogeneous EHR data , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Rebecca Cannings-John,et al.  Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  P. Zimmet,et al.  The Rising Global Burden of Diabetes and its Complications: Estimates and Projections to the Year 2010 , 1997, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[16]  G. Ginsburg,et al.  Personalized medicine: revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  Noémie Elhadad,et al.  From Personal Informatics to Personal Analytics: Investigating How Clinicians and Patients Reason About Personal Data Generated with Self-Monitoring in Diabetes , 2017 .

[18]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A stage-based model of personal informatics systems , 2010, CHI.

[19]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  A lived informatics model of personal informatics , 2015, UbiComp.

[20]  Gang-hoon Kim,et al.  Potentiality of Big Data in the Medical Sector: Focus on How to Reshape the Healthcare System , 2013, Healthcare informatics research.

[21]  Liliane Mouawad,et al.  vSDC: a method to improve early recognition in virtual screening when limited experimental resources are available , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[22]  K. Freedland,et al.  The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[23]  Carolyn Petersen,et al.  Patient-generated health data: a pathway to enhanced long-term cancer survivorship , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Raghunath Nambiar,et al.  A look at challenges and opportunities of Big Data analytics in healthcare , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data.

[25]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[26]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Leveraging 3D chemical similarity, target and phenotypic data in the identification of drug-protein and drug-adverse effect associations , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[27]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Personalized glucose forecasting for type 2 diabetes using data assimilation , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Elbert S. Huang,et al.  Diabetes Health Disparities , 2007 .

[29]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Adopting the sensemaking perspective for chronic disease self-management , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[30]  Elizabeth M. Heitkemper,et al.  Structured scaffolding for reflection and problem solving in diabetes self-management: qualitative study of mobile diabetes detective , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Jean Nagelkerk PhD Aprn Bc,et al.  Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management , 2006 .

[32]  V L Patel,et al.  Hypothesis Generation and the Coordination of Theory and Evidence in Novice Diagnostic Reasoning , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[33]  J. Nagelkerk,et al.  Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[34]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[35]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Participatory approach to the development of a knowledge base for problem-solving in diabetes self-management , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[37]  Yu-Chuan Li,et al.  Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers , 2015, MedInfo.

[38]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[39]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  L. Welschen,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[41]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2002, CHI 2002.