A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity

We merge research into knowledge management, absorptive capacity, and dynamic capabilities to arrive at an integrative perspective, which considers knowledge exploration, retention, and exploitation inside and outside a firm's boundaries. By complementing the concept of absorptive capacity, we advance towards a capability-based framework for open innovation processes. We identify the following six ‘knowledge capacities’ as a firm's critical capabilities of managing internal and external knowledge in open innovation processes: inventive, absorptive, transformative, connective, innovative, and desorptive capacity. ‘Knowledge management capacity’ is a dynamic capability, which reconfigures and realigns the knowledge capacities. It refers to a firm's ability to successfully manage its knowledge base over time. The concept may be regarded as a framework for open innovation, as a complement to absorptive capacity, and as a move towards understanding dynamic capabilities for managing knowledge. On this basis, it contributes to explaining interfirm heterogeneity in knowledge and alliance strategies, organizational boundaries, and innovation performance.

[1]  Dorothy A. Leonard,et al.  Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development , 2011 .

[2]  U. Lichtenthaler Organizing for external technology exploitation in diversified firms , 2010 .

[3]  Maike Scherrer-Rathje,et al.  Outsourcing and its Impact on Manufacturing Flexibility: Contingencies Matter , 2010 .

[4]  U. Lichtenthaler RETRACTED: Determinants of proactive and reactive technology licensing: A contingency perspective , 2010 .

[5]  U. Lichtenthaler Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[6]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  RETRACTED: The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium- and high-technology firms , 2009 .

[7]  Joel West,et al.  Commercializing Open Science: Deep Space Communications as the Lead Market for Shannon Theory, 196073 , 2008 .

[8]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[9]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[10]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Systemic innovation in a distributed network: the case of Danish wind turbines, 1972—2007 , 2008 .

[11]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmentalthreat on Product Exploration and Exploitation , 2008 .

[12]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[14]  Krsto Pandza,et al.  Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems , 2007 .

[15]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: The case of IBM , 2007 .

[16]  Andrew Hess,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Harbir Singh Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success , 2007 .

[18]  H. Maibom Social Systems , 2007 .

[19]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The Drivers of Technology Licensing: An Industry Comparison , 2007 .

[20]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  To succeed in the long-term, focus on the middle-term. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[21]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[22]  W. Bogner,et al.  Knowledge Management as the Basis of Sustained High Performance , 2007 .

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[25]  H. Chesbrough Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[26]  Boaz Bernstein,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms , 2006, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[27]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[28]  Gregory N. Stock,et al.  Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation , 2006 .

[29]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[30]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[31]  Mike Wright,et al.  University Spin-Out Companies and Venture Capital , 2006 .

[32]  Andrea Fosfuri The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[33]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[34]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in the Software Industry: Identifying Dimensions That Affect Knowledge and Knowledge Creation Activities , 2005 .

[38]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[39]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[40]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[41]  Jonathan L. Zittrain In Praise of Uncertainty , 2005 .

[42]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[43]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy , 2005 .

[44]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Knowledge Stocks and Information Flows in New Product Development , 2004 .

[45]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  Choosing Equity Stakes in Technology-Sourcing Relationships: An Integrative Framework , 2004 .

[46]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[47]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[48]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[49]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  When to ally & when to acquire. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[50]  Marie Carpenter,et al.  The stock market and innovative capability in the New Economy: the optical networking industry , 2003 .

[51]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[52]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[53]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[55]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Managing the disruptive technologies life cycle by externalising the research: social network and corporate venturing in the Silicon Valley , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[56]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[57]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[58]  S. McGaughey,et al.  Strategic Interventions in Intellectual Asset Flows , 2002 .

[59]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions , 2002 .

[60]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[61]  Lotfi Belkhir,et al.  Managing Innovation at Xerox , 2001 .

[62]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[63]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[64]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[65]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[66]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[67]  S SilvermanBrian,et al.  Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification , 1999 .

[68]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[69]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[70]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[71]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[72]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[73]  S. Floyd,et al.  Knowledge Creation and Social Networks in Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Renewal of Organizational Capability , 1999 .

[74]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[75]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[76]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[77]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[78]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[79]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[80]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[81]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[82]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[83]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[84]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[85]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[86]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[87]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[88]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[89]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[90]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Fit, failure, and the hall of fame : how companies succeed or fail , 1994 .

[91]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[92]  E. Zajac,et al.  FROM TRANSACTION COST TO TRANSACTIONAL VALUE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES* , 1993 .

[93]  R. Zytner Adsorption-desorption of trichloroethylene in granular media , 1992 .

[94]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[95]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[96]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[97]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[98]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[99]  Rolf Mirus A Note on the Choice between Licensing and Direct Foreign Investment , 1980 .

[100]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[101]  D. Campbell Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.