Statistical assessment of time-varying dependency between two neurons.

The joint peristimulus time histogram (JPSTH) provides a visual representation of the dynamics of correlated activity for a pair of neurons. There are many ways to adjust the JPSTH for the time-varying firing-rate modulation of each neuron, and then to define a suitable measure of time-varying correlated activity. Our approach is to introduce a statistical model for the time-varying joint spiking activity so that the joint firing rate can be estimated more efficiently. We have applied an adaptive smoothing method, which has been shown to be effective in capturing sudden changes in firing rate, to the ratio of joint firing probability to the probability of firing predicted by independence. A bootstrap procedure, applicable to both Poisson and non-Poisson data, was used to define a statistical significance test of whether a large ratio could be attributable to chance alone. A numerical simulation showed that the bootstrap-based significance test has very nearly the correct rejection probability, and can have markedly better power to detect departures from independence than does an approach based on testing contiguous bins in the JPSTH. In a companion paper, we show how this formulation can accommodate latency and time-varying excitability effects, which can confound spike timing effects.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  R. Cowan An introduction to the theory of point processes , 1978 .

[3]  P H Ellaway,et al.  The source and distribution of short-term synchrony between gamma-motoneurones in the cat. , 1985, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[4]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Point process models of single-neuron discharges , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Kass,et al.  Statistical smoothing of neuronal data. , 2003, Network.

[6]  Kathryn Roeder,et al.  Integration of association statistics over genomic regions using Bayesian adaptive regression splines , 2003, Human Genomics.

[7]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[8]  Carlos D. Brody,et al.  Correlations Without Synchrony , 1999, Neural Computation.

[9]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[10]  C. Gray,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms Contributing to Response Variability of Cortical Neurons In Vivo , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  R N Lemon,et al.  Synchronization in monkey motor cortex during a precision grip task. I. Task-dependent modulation in single-unit synchrony. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M K Habib,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  C. Woody Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[15]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  The Time-Rescaling Theorem and Its Application to Neural Spike Train Data Analysis , 2002, Neural Computation.

[16]  Robert E Kass,et al.  Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[18]  R. Kass,et al.  Bayesian curve-fitting with free-knot splines , 2001 .

[19]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[20]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Stuart N. Baker,et al.  An Accurate Measure of the Instantaneous Discharge Probability, with Application to Unitary Joint-Event Analysis , 2000, Neural Computation.

[22]  M. Hansen,et al.  Spline Adaptation in Extended Linear Models , 1998 .

[23]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Determination of Response Latency and Its Application to Normalization of Cross-Correlation Measures , 2001, Neural Computation.

[24]  Y. Ritov,et al.  Failure in identification of overlapping spikes from multiple neuron activity causes artificial correlations , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Hiroyuki Ito,et al.  Model Dependence in Quantification of Spike Interdependence by Joint Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram , 2000, Neural Computation.

[26]  M. Quirk,et al.  Construction and analysis of non-Poisson stimulus-response models of neural spiking activity , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Hagai Bergman,et al.  Trial to trial variability in either stimulus or action causes apparent correlation and synchrony in neuronal activity , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Non-parametric significance estimation of joint-spike events by shuffling and resampling , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[29]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Effect of cross-trial nonstationarity on joint-spike events , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  F. Mechler,et al.  Neural coding of spatial phase in V1 of the macaque monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Single-trial estimation of neuronal firing rates: From single-neuron spike trains to population activity , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Robert E Kass,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability and its effect on time-varying dependency between two neurons. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Valérie Ventura,et al.  Testing for and Estimating Latency Effects for Poisson and Non-Poisson Spike Trains , 2004, Neural Computation.

[34]  Robert E. Kass,et al.  A Spike-Train Probability Model , 2001, Neural Computation.