A Response to Professor Paul A. Samuelson’s Objections to Kelly Capital Growth Investing

The Kelly capital growth investment strategy maximizes the expected utility of final wealth with a Bernoulli logarithmic utility function. In 1956, Kelly showed that static expected log maximization yields the maximum asymptotic long-run growth. Good properties include minimizing the time to large asymptotic goals, maximizing the median, and being ahead (on average) after the first period. Bad properties include extremely large bets for short-term favorable investment situations because the Arrow-Pratt risk aversion index is essentially zero. Paul Samuelson was a critic of this approach, and his criticism is partially responsible for the fact that most finance academics and investment professionals do not recommend Kelly strategies. Samuelson’s points are theoretically correct and sharpen the theory, cautioning Kelly investors to understand the strategy’s true characteristics, including ways to lower investment exposure. His objections help us better understand the theory without detracting from its numerous valuable applications.

[1]  Mark Rubinstein,et al.  THE STRONG CASE FOR THE GENERALIZED LOGARITHMIC UTILITY MODEL AS THE PREMIER MODEL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS , 1976 .

[2]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Efficiency of the Market for Racetrack Betting , 1981 .

[3]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  Time to wealth goals in capital accumulation , 2005 .

[4]  P. Samuelson The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments , 1970 .

[5]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  An application of expert information to win betting on the Kentucky Derby, 1981–2005 , 2006 .

[6]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Transactions Costs, Extent of Inefficiencies, Entries and Multiple Wagers in a Racetrack Betting Model , 1985 .

[7]  H. Latané Criteria for Choice Among Risky Ventures , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Fallacy of the Log-normal Approximation to Optimal Portfolio Decision-making Over Many Periods , 2017 .

[9]  Harry M. Markowitz Samuelson and Investment for the Long Run , 2006 .

[10]  E. Thorp The Kelly Criterion in Blackjack Sports Betting, and the Stock Market , 2008 .

[11]  W. Ziemba The Stochastic Programming Approach to Asset, Liability, and Wealth Management , 2003 .

[12]  John L. Kelly,et al.  A new interpretation of information rate , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  P. Samuelson Why we should not make mean log of wealth big though years to act are long , 1979 .

[14]  K. Jim Radford,et al.  Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance , 1976 .

[15]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[16]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  The Symmetric Downside-Risk Sharpe Ratio , 2005 .

[17]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  OR Practice - Playing the Turn-of-the-Year Effect with Index Futures , 1987, Oper. Res..

[18]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  A preference foundation for log mean-variance criteria in portfolio choice problems , 1993 .

[19]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Dr. Z's beat the racetrack , 1987 .

[20]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Optimal capital growth with convex shortfall penalties , 2016 .

[21]  P. Samuelson LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION BY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING , 1969 .

[22]  R. Roll,et al.  EVIDENCE ON THE “GROWTH-OPTIMUM” MODEL , 1973 .

[23]  N. H. Hakansson. ON OPTIMAL MYOPIC PORTFOLIO POLICIES, WITH AND WITHOUT SERIAL CORRELATION OF YIELDS , 1971 .

[24]  T. Cover,et al.  Asymptotic optimality and asymptotic equipartition properties of log-optimum investment , 1988 .

[25]  W. Poundstone Fortune's Formula: The Untold Story of the Scientific Betting System That Beat the Casinos and Wall Street , 2005 .

[26]  N. H. Hakansson. Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection , 1971, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[27]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  How Does the Fortune’s Formula Kelly CapitalGrowth Model Perform? , 2011, The Journal of Portfolio Management.

[28]  P. Samuelson St. Petersburg Paradoxes: Defanged, Dissected, and Historically Described , 1977 .

[29]  J. J. Kelly A new interpretation of information rate , 1956 .

[30]  J. Mossin Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies , 1968 .

[31]  Edward O. Thorp,et al.  Understanding the Kelly Criterion , 2011 .

[32]  W. Ziemba The Symmetric Downside-Risk Sharpe Ratio and the Evaluation of Great Investors and Speculators , 2016 .

[33]  Andrea Frazzini,et al.  Buffett’s Alpha , 2013, Financial Analysts Journal.

[34]  L. Breiman INVESTMENT POLICIES FOR EXPANDING BUSINESSES OPTIMAL IN A LONG-RUN SENSE , 1960 .

[35]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Capital growth with security , 2004 .

[36]  James A. Ohlson The Asymptotic Validity of Quadratic Utility as the Trading Interval Approaches Zero , 1975 .

[37]  William T. Ziemba Calendar Anomalies And Arbitrage , 2012 .

[38]  P. Samuelson Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[39]  Concave Utilities are Distinguished by their Optimal Strategies , 2011 .

[40]  N. P. Landsman,et al.  A random walk down Wall Street , 2008 .

[41]  The geometric-mean principle revisited: A reply , 1978 .

[42]  H. Markowitz Investment for the Long Run: New Evidence for an Old Rule , 1976 .

[43]  I. Karatzas,et al.  Stochastic Portfolio Theory: an Overview , 2009 .

[44]  E. Thorp,et al.  The Kelly Capital Growth Investment Criterion: Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[45]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  Beat the Racetrack , 1984 .

[46]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Growth versus security in dynamic investment analysis , 1992 .

[47]  M. Pabrai The Dhandho Investor: The Low-Risk Value Method to High Returns , 2007 .