An Empirical Illustration and Formalization of the Theory of Direct Learning: The Muscle-Based Perception of Kinetic Properties

The theory of direct learning portrays learning as specificity between higher order informational quantities, referred to as information for learning, and change in performance that occurs with practice (Jacobs & Michaels, 2007). The focus of the theory is on the lawful generation and possible use of information for learning. This study illustrates and further develops the theory. Participants in the study were asked to judge the mass of unseen handheld objects. In Experiment 1, different participants received feedback on different mechanical properties of the objects, and in Experiment 2, different participants practiced with different sets of objects. The practice led to changes in performance that, in the present portrayal, show up as movements through manifolds. As predicted by the theory, these movements are specific to information for learning, the most precise description of which is obtained with difference equations. A second and more theoretical part of the article provides a tentative formalization of the theory.

[1]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Perceptual learning and the visual control of braking , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  M. Turvey,et al.  The ecological approach to perceiving-acting: a pictorial essay. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Turvey Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[8]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Skill Acquisition: An Event Approach with Special Reference to Searching for the Optimum of a Function of Several Variables , 1978 .

[9]  D W Repperger,et al.  The intentional spring: a strategy for modeling systems that learn to perform intentional acts. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  S. Runeson On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[11]  K M Newell,et al.  Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. , 2009, Human movement science.

[12]  Laurence C. Breaker,et al.  A Proposed Definition for Vector Correlation in Geophysics: Theory and Application , 1993 .

[13]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Learning to control collisions: the role of perceptual attunement and action boundaries. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M T Turvey,et al.  Attunement, Calibration, and Exploration in Fast Haptic Perceptual Learning , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Rob Withagen,et al.  The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  The learning of goal-directed locomotion: a perception-action perspective. , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Learning to visually perceive the relative mass of colliding balls in globally and locally constrained task ecologies. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[21]  C. Michaels,et al.  Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[23]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Direct Learning , 2007 .

[24]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  K. Newell,et al.  Time scales in motor learning and development. , 2001, Psychological review.

[26]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  On the Apparent Paradox of Learning and Realism , 2002 .

[27]  Brett R Fajen Learning novel mappings from optic flow to the control of action. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[28]  S. Runeson,et al.  Realism of Confidence, Modes of Apprehension, and Variable-Use in Visual Discrimination of Relative Mass , 2008 .

[29]  Robert,et al.  10 How to Draw Learning Curves : Their Use and Justification , 2022 .

[30]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception I: operative optical variables, attunement, and calibration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Individual differences in learning to perceive length by dynamic touch: Evidence for variation in perceptual learning capacities , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio scaling and feedback , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M T Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  I. Kingma,et al.  The Inertia Tensor Versus Static Moment and Mass in Perceiving Length and Heaviness of Hand-Wielded Rods , 2002 .

[36]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Mode Transition and Change in Variable Use in Perceptual Learning , 2006 .

[37]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Chapter 11 – Dynamic Touch , 1995 .

[38]  A. Kirlik Brunswikian Resources for Event-Perception Research , 2009, Perception.

[39]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[40]  Wendy D. Zosh,et al.  Optic Flow Drives Human Visuo-Locomotor Adaptation , 2007, Current Biology.

[41]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perception of space and motion , 1995 .

[43]  J. Kelso,et al.  The Excitator as a Minimal Model for the Coordination Dynamics of Discrete and Rhythmic Movement Generation , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  A. Noē Direct Perception , 2022 .

[45]  P. Juslin,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[46]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Direct learning in dynamic touch. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.