Low Dimensional Activity in Spiking Neuronal Networks

Several recent studies have shown that neural activity in vivo tends to be constrained to a low-dimensional manifold. Such activity does not arise in simulated neural networks with homogeneous connectivity and it has been suggested that it is indicative of some other connectivity pattern in neuronal networks. Surprisingly, the structure of the intrinsic manifold of the network activity puts constraints on learning. For instance, animals find it difficult to perform tasks that may require a change in the intrinsic manifold. Here, we demonstrate that the Neural Engineering Framework (NEF) can be adapted to design a biologically plausible spiking neuronal network that exhibit low dimensional activity. Consistent with experimental observations, the resulting synaptic weight distribution is heavy-tailed (log-normal). In our model, a change in the intrinsic manifold of the network activity requires rewiring of the whole network, which may be either not possible or a very slow process. This observation provides an explanation of why learning is easier when it does not require the neural activity to leave its intrinsic manifold. Significance statement A network in the brain consists of thousands of neurons. A priori, we expect that the network will have as many degrees of freedom as its number of neurons. Surprisingly, experimental evidence suggests that local brain activity is confined to a space spanned by 10 variables. Here, we describe an approach to construct spiking neuronal networks that exhibit low-dimensional activity and address the question: how the intrinsic dimensionality of the network activity restricts the learning as suggested by recent experiments? Specifically, we show that tasks that requires animals to change the network activity outside the intrinsic space would entail large changes in the neuronal connectivity, and therefore, animals are either slow or not able to acquire such tasks.

[1]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  The High-Conductance State of Cortical Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[2]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons , 2000, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Variability in neuronal activity in primate cortex during working memory tasks , 2007, Neuroscience.

[4]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Cortical Preparatory Activity: Representation of Movement or First Cog in a Dynamical Machine? , 2010, Neuron.

[5]  Roland R. Regoes,et al.  Investigating the Consequences of Interference between Multiple CD8+ T Cell Escape Mutations in Early HIV Infection , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Physiology and Impact of Horizontal Connections in Rat Neocortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex , 2015, Science.

[8]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Predictive Coding of Dynamical Variables in Balanced Spiking Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  P. Dayan,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S9 References the Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits , 2022 .

[10]  Dean V. Buonomano,et al.  Harnessing Chaos in Recurrent Neural Networks , 2009, Neuron.

[11]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Solving the Problem of Negative Synaptic Weights in Cortical Models , 2008, Neural Computation.

[12]  K. Svoboda,et al.  The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections , 2009, Nature.

[13]  P. Strata,et al.  Dale’s principle , 1999, Brain Research Bulletin.

[14]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition , 2013 .

[15]  Christos Constantinidis,et al.  Stable population coding for working memory coexists with heterogeneous neural dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  Emergence of complex computational structures from chaotic neural networks through reward-modulated Hebbian learning. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Scaling Properties of Dimensionality Reduction for Neural Populations and Network Models , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  G. La Camera,et al.  Stimuli Reduce the Dimensionality of Cortical Activity , 2015, bioRxiv.

[21]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  A Unified Approach to Building and Controlling Spiking Attractor Networks , 2005, Neural Computation.

[22]  L. F. Abbott,et al.  Building functional networks of spiking model neurons , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Fine-Tuning and the Stability of Recurrent Neural Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Trevor Bekolay,et al.  Nengo: a Python tool for building large-scale functional brain models , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[25]  K. Miller,et al.  One-Dimensional Dynamics of Attention and Decision Making in LIP , 2008, Neuron.

[26]  Moritz Helias,et al.  Decorrelation of Neural-Network Activity by Inhibitory Feedback , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Thomas K. Berger,et al.  A synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Neural constraints on learning , 2014, Nature.

[29]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Beyond the Cortical Column: Abundance and Physiology of Horizontal Connections Imply a Strong Role for Inputs from the Surround , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[30]  Mark M. Churchland,et al.  Using Firing-Rate Dynamics to Train Recurrent Networks of Spiking Model Neurons , 2016, 1601.07620.

[31]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Efficient codes and balanced networks , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Nelson,et al.  Motor Planning under Unpredictable Reward: Modulations of Movement Vigor and Primate Striatum Activity , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  L. F. Abbott,et al.  Generating Coherent Patterns of Activity from Chaotic Neural Networks , 2009, Neuron.

[34]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Neural Engineering: Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[35]  Prof. Dr. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[36]  B. Zemelman,et al.  The columnar and laminar organization of inhibitory connections to neocortical excitatory cells , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Multidigit Movement Synergies of the Human Hand in an Unconstrained Haptic Exploration Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The statistics of natural hand movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  G. Laurent,et al.  Transient Dynamics versus Fixed Points in Odor Representations by Locust Antennal Lobe Projection Neurons , 2005, Neuron.

[41]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Neural population dynamics during reaching , 2012, Nature.