Influence of the eluent composition on the ionization efficiency for morphine of pneumatically assisted electrospray, atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization and sonic spray.

A comparative study of three atmospheric-pressure ionization (API) sources for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), namely pneumatically assisted electrospray or ionspray (IS), atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and sonic spray (SS), with respect to the influence of the eluent composition on the ionization of morphine, is presented. The effect of organic modifiers, volatile acids, and buffer systems (with and without pH adjustment) in the LC mobile phase on the ionization efficiency of each interface is described. We conclude that for all three ion sources, the composition of the liquid phase had a serious impact on the ionization of the target compound. For IS and SS, very similar behavior towards the LC eluent was observed. In both cases, an increase in organic modifier resulted in an increase in ionization, while an increasing amount of volatile acid or buffer caused signal suppression. APCI, on the other hand, proved to respond completely differently towards the changes in the eluent. Again, an increased ionization was observed with an increase in organic modifier content but this time also in the presence of mobile phase additives like acids or buffers. Finally, we concluded that APCI proved to be the preferred ion source for the test compound because of its robust character and its direct applicability in traditional LC analysis.

[1]  K. Markides,et al.  Studies of signal suppression in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using volatile ion-pairing reagents. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  W. Lambert,et al.  Comparison of phenyl-type columns in the development of a fast liquid chromatographic system for eighteen opiates commonly found in forensic toxicology. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  R. B. Geerdink,et al.  Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric analysis of surface and waste water with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation I: instrumentation , 2000 .

[4]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Determination of polar pesticides with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry using methanol and/or acetonitrile for solid-phase desorption and gradient liquid chromatography. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  A. Bruins Mechanistic aspects of electrospray ionization , 1998 .

[6]  Robert K. Boyd,et al.  ‘Wrong‐way‐round’ Electrospray Ionization of Amino Acids , 1997 .

[7]  H. Koizumi,et al.  Recent progress in atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry , 1997 .

[8]  S. K. Huang,et al.  Optimization of the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry interface , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[9]  Shaolian Zhou,et al.  Effects of solvent composition on molecular ion response in electrospray mass spectrometry: Investigation of the ionization processes , 1995 .

[10]  H. Koizumi,et al.  Sonic Spray Ionization Method for Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectrometry , 1994 .

[11]  A. Bruins Mass spectrometry with ion sources operating at atmospheric pressure , 1991 .