Attractiveness in the eyes: A possibility of positive loop between transient pupil constriction and facial attraction

Contrary to the long-held belief of a close linkage between pupil dilation and attractiveness, we found an early and transient pupil constriction response when participants viewed an attractive face (and the effect of luminance/contrast is controlled). While human participants were making an attractiveness judgment on faces, their pupil constricted more for the more attractive (as-to-be-rated) faces. Further experiments showed that the effect of pupil constriction to attractiveness judgment extended to intrinsically aesthetic visual objects such as natural scene images (as well as faces) but not to line-drawing geometric figures. When participants were asked to judge the roundness of faces, pupil constriction still correlated with their attractiveness but not the roundness rating score, indicating the automaticity of the pupil constriction to attractiveness. When pupillary responses were manipulated implicitly by relative background luminance changes (from the pre-stimulus screen), the facial attractiveness ratings were in accordance with the amount of pupil constriction, which could not be explained solely by simultaneous or sequential luminance contrast. The overall results suggest that pupil constriction not only reflects but, as a part of self-monitoring and attribution mechanisms, also possibly contributes facial attractiveness implicitly.

[1]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Comparing methods for the analysis of pupillary response , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[2]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Shigeki Nakauchi,et al.  Colorful glares: Effects of colors on brightness illusions measured with pupillometry. , 2019, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Ueli Rutishauser,et al.  Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[5]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  Pupillometry: A sexual selection approach , 2004 .

[6]  P. Binda,et al.  Pupil size reflects the focus of feature-based attention. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  F. Campbell,et al.  Effect of Size of Pupil on Visual Acuity , 1960, Nature.

[8]  E. Hess,et al.  PUPIL RESPONSE OF HETERO- AND HOMOSEXUAL MALES TO PICTURES OF MEN AND WOMEN: A PILOT STUDY. , 1965, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  Jum C. Nunnally,et al.  Pupillary response as a general measure of activation , 1967 .

[11]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[13]  F. N. Willis,et al.  Eye contact, pupil dilation, and personal preference , 1967 .

[14]  R. Savin-Williams,et al.  The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Shiro Usui,et al.  A method for monitoring autonomic nervous activity by pupillary flash response , 2000, Systems and Computers in Japan.

[16]  H. Critchley,et al.  Dynamic pupillary exchange engages brain regions encoding social salience , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[17]  R. Howell,et al.  Pupillometric and personality test score differences of female aggressing pedophiliacs and normals , 1971 .

[18]  R. Bull,et al.  Pupil Dilation, Sex of Stimulus, and Age and Sex of Observer , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Petter Johansson,et al.  Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task , 2005, Science.

[20]  D. Dutton,et al.  Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[22]  P. Dayan,et al.  Pupil-linked phasic arousal evoked by violation but not emergence of regularity within rapid sound sequences , 2019, Nature Communications.

[23]  Megan H. Papesh,et al.  Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories , 2012 .

[24]  Shepherd Jw,et al.  The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. , 1973 .

[25]  M. Bradley,et al.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[26]  P. G. Caryl,et al.  Women's preference for male pupil-size: Effects of conception risk, sociosexuality and relationship status , 2009 .

[27]  E. Hess ATTITUDE AND PUPIL SIZE. , 1965, Scientific American.

[28]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Lawrence E Mays,et al.  Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  A. Damasio The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Modulation of the pupillary response by the content of visual working memory , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  C. Ellis,et al.  The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  R. Koff,et al.  Sociometric Choice: A Study in Pupillary Response , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[35]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Visual categorization is automatic and obligatory: evidence from Stroop-like paradigm. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[36]  Shiro Usui,et al.  Estimation of autonomic nervous activity using the inverse dynamic model of the pupil muscle plant , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  H. Critchley,et al.  Pupillary contagion: central mechanisms engaged in sadness processing. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[38]  M. P. Janisse,et al.  Pupil size and affect: A critical review of the literature since 1960. , 1973 .

[39]  A method for monitoring autonomic nervous activity by pupillary flash response , 2000 .

[40]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[41]  T. Knapen,et al.  Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Jens Schmidtke,et al.  PUPILLOMETRY IN LINGUISTIC RESEARCH , 2017, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[43]  B. Laeng,et al.  Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[45]  S. Schachter The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State , 1964 .

[46]  Shigeto Furukawa,et al.  Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[47]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The effects of neural gain on attention and learning , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The pupillary light response reflects exogenous attention and inhibition of return. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[49]  K. Goryo,et al.  Attenuation of the pupillary response to luminance and color changes during interocular suppression. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[50]  Thos M. Simms Pupillary response of male and female subjects to pupillary difference in male and female picture stimuli , 1967 .

[51]  S. Furukawa,et al.  Human Pupillary Dilation Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli: Effects of Stimulus Properties and Voluntary Attention , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[52]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Grainger,et al.  The Pupillary Light Response Reveals the Focus of Covert Visual Attention , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  J D Barlow,et al.  Pupillary Size as an Index of Preference in Political Candidates , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[55]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fully Formatted Pdf and Full Text (html) Versions Will Be Made Available Soon. Pupil Dilation Betrays the Timing of Decisions , 2022 .

[56]  E H Hess,et al.  The role of pupil size in communication. , 1975, Scientific American.

[57]  Robert J Snowden,et al.  Personality Disorders : Theory , Research , and Treatment Emotional Modulation of the Pupil Response in Psychopathy , 2018 .

[58]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  1.26 – Pupillary Control Pathways , 2008 .