Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Stochastic Species Invasions

Recent analyses demonstrate that the spatial–temporal behavior of invasive species requires optimal management decisions over space and time. From a spatial perspective, this bioeconomic optimization model broadens away from invasive species spread at a frontier or to neighbors by examining short and long-distance dispersal, directionality in spread, and network geometry. In terms of uncertainty and dynamics, this framework incorporates several sources of stochasticity, decisions with multi-year implications, and temporal ecological processes. This paper employs a unique Markov decision process planning algorithm and a Monte Carlo simulation of the stochastic system to explore the spatial-dynamic optimal policy for a river network facing a bioinvasion, with Tamarisk as an example. In addition to exploring the spatial, stochastic, and dynamic aspects of management of invasions, the results demonstrate how the interaction of spatial and multi-period processes contributes to finding the optimal policy. Those interactions prove critical in determining the right management tool, in the right location, at the right time, which informs the management implications drawn from simpler frameworks. In particular, as compared to other modeling framework’s policy prescriptions, the framework here finds more use of the management tool restoration and more management in highly connected locations, which leads to a less invaded system over time.

[1]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? , 2000 .

[2]  P. Hulme Beyond control : wider implications for the management of biological invasions , 2006 .

[3]  Heidi J. Albers,et al.  Irreversible ecosystem change, species competition, and shifting cultivation , 2000 .

[4]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[5]  James E. Wilen,et al.  Optimal spatial control of biological invasions , 2012 .

[6]  Junjie Wu,et al.  Targeting conservation efforts in the presence of threshold effects and ecosystem linkages , 2002 .

[7]  Santanu Roy,et al.  The Economics of Controlling a Stochastic Biological Invasion , 2002 .

[8]  David Aadland,et al.  Complementarity in the provision of ecosystem services reduces the cost of mitigating amplified natural disturbance events , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Erika S. Zavaleta The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub , 2000 .

[10]  Kimberly Burnett,et al.  Prevention, Eradication, and Containment of Invasive Species: Illustrations from Hawaii , 2006, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[11]  A. Hastings,et al.  Controlling established invaders: integrating economics and spread dynamics to determine optimal management. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[12]  James N. Sanchirico,et al.  Spatial Management of Invasive Species: Pathways and Policy Options , 2010 .

[13]  Eli P. Fenichel,et al.  The Control of Invasive Species on Private Property with Neighbor-to-Neighbor Spillovers , 2014, Environmental & resource economics.

[14]  James N. Sanchirico,et al.  The Economics of Spatial-Dynamic Processes: Applications to Renewable Resources , 2007 .

[15]  Optimal spatial-dynamic resource allocation facing uncertainty : integrating economics and ecology for invasive species policy , 2014 .

[16]  Tetsuya Horie,et al.  Optimal detection strategies for an established invasive pest , 2011 .

[17]  G. Cornelis van Kooten,et al.  Uncertainty, Economics, and the Spread of an Invasive Plant Species , 2002 .

[18]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  PAC optimal MDP planning with application to invasive species management , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  S. Levin,et al.  A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  I. Chades,et al.  General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Heidi J. Albers,et al.  Modeling Ecological Constraints on Tropical Forest Management: Spatial Interdependence, Irreversibility, and Uncertainty , 1996 .

[23]  B. Everitt Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande , 1998, Wetlands.

[24]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models , 2008, Biology Letters.

[25]  A. Sher,et al.  Seedling competition between native Populus deltoides (Salicaceae) and exotic Tamarix ramosissima (Tamaricaceae) across water regimes and substrate types. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[26]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  A bioeconomic analysis of an emerald ash borer invasion of an urban forest with multiple jurisdictions , 2014 .

[27]  J. Stromberg Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona , 1998 .

[28]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[29]  D. Finnoff,et al.  The role of spatial scale in the timing of uncertain environmental policy , 2012 .

[30]  R. Petit,et al.  Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[31]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Spatial-Endogenous Fire Risk and Efficient Fuel Management and Timber Harvest , 2008, Land Economics.

[32]  J. Wilen,et al.  Individual and Cooperative Management of Invasive Species in Human‐Mediated Landscapes , 2015 .