Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests

Strip extensometry tests are usually considered less reliable than trephinate inflation tests in studying corneal biomechanics. In spite of the evident simplicity of strip extensometry tests, several earlier studies preferred inflation tests in determining the constitutive relationship of the cornea and its other material properties, such as Young's modulus and the hysteresis behaviour. In this research, the deficiencies of the strip tests are discussed and a mathematical procedure presented to take account of these deficiencies when obtaining the corneal material properties. The study also involves testing 10 pairs of porcine corneas using both strip extensometry and trephinate inflation techniques and the results are subjected to mathematical back analysis in order to determine the stress–strain behaviour. The behaviour obtained from the strip extensometry tests and using the new mathematical analysis procedure is shown to match closely the inflation test results.

[1]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  Age-dependent residual tensile strains are present in the dura mater of rats , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  K. Buzard.  Introduction to biomechanics of the cornea. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[3]  R P Vito,et al.  The distribution of strain in the human cornea. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  T.H.G. Megson.  Structural and Stress Analysis , 1996 .

[5]  J O Hjortdal,et al.  Regional elastic performance of the human cornea. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G. W. Nyquist,et al.  Rheology of the cornea: experimental techniques and results. , 1968, Experimental eye research.

[7]  W. A. Schlegel,et al.  Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. , 1972, Experimental eye research.

[8]  J. Hjortdal,et al.  On the biomechanical properties of the cornea with particular reference to refractive surgery. , 1998, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[9]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Application of structural analysis to the mechanical behaviour of the cornea , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  P R Greene,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. , 1982, Experimental eye research.

[11]  M Matallana,et al.  Does Bowman's layer determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea? , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[12]  H. Oxlund,et al.  Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. , 1980, Experimental eye research.

[14]  D. Hoeltzel,et al.  Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  R. Vito,et al.  A mechanical model of the cornea: the effects of physiological and surgical factors on radial keratotomy surgery. , 1989, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[16]  Katherine Desiree Voorhies,et al.  Static and Dynamic Stress/Strain Properties for Human and Porcine Eyes , 2003 .

[17]  M. R. Bryant,et al.  Constitutive laws for biomechanical modeling of refractive surgery. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  W K McEwen,et al.  Immediate rigidity of an eye. I. Whole, segments and strips. , 1970, Experimental eye research.