Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children

Twenty adults were asked to read a three-paragraph expository text on differences among insects. Information in the text had been rated for importance and interestingness. Half of the adults read the text with "seductive details" (propositions presenting interesting, but unimportant, information), half without. After reading, the adults recalled the important information (a macroprocessing task), rated the text for overall interestingness, reported the single most interesting piece of information read, and matched pictures of animals on the basis of differences mentioned in text (a microprocessing task). The adults presented with seductive details in text were significantly less adept than their peers at including three main ideas in their recall protocols. Microprocessing performance and interestingness ratings were unaffected by text condition. In a second study, with 36 seventh graders, macroprocessing performance in general was weak. Students presented with seductive details in text were significantly...

[1]  Mark G. Gillingham Text in computer-based instruction: what the research says , 1988 .

[2]  J. Larkin,et al.  Novice Importance Rules: Definitions and Equations , 1987 .

[3]  A. Iran-Nejad Cognitive and affective causes of interest and liking. , 1987 .

[4]  Production anomalies (not strategic deficiencies) in mentally retarded individuals , 1987 .

[5]  R. Garner Metacognition and reading comprehension , 1987 .

[6]  Valerie Anderson,et al.  Producing Written Summaries: Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction , 1986 .

[7]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  Interestingness - A Neglected Variable in Discourse Processing , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[9]  John B. Black,et al.  Understanding expository text : a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text , 1986 .

[10]  Children's Knowledge of Structural Properties of Expository Text. , 1986 .

[11]  Christina Haas,et al.  'What did I just say?’ Reading problems in writing with the machine , 1986 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson Interestingness of children's reading material , 1984 .

[13]  Categorization, Macrostructure, and Finding the Main Idea. , 1984 .

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[15]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose. , 1982 .

[16]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Elaborations: When do they Help and When do they Hurt? , 1982 .

[17]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A model of reader strategy for abstracting main ideas from simple technical prose , 1982 .

[18]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  That's Important But is it Interesting? Two Factors in Text Processing , 1982 .

[19]  Sonia Ganger,et al.  Text Variations at the Level of the Individual Sentence and the Comprehension of Simple Expository Paragraphs. , 1981 .

[20]  D. Kieras Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[21]  T. Van Dijk,et al.  RELEVANCE ASSIGNMENT IN DISCOURSE COMPREHENSION , 1979 .

[22]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[23]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.