Numerical comparison of patch and sandwich piezoelectric transducers for transmitting ultrasonic waves

Guided wave ultrasonic inspection is becoming an important method of non-destructive testing for long, slender structures such as pipes and rails. Often it is desirable to use transducers that can strongly excite a specific mode of wave propagation in the waveguide. Piezoelectric patch transducers are frequently employed, by researchers, for exciting waves in beam like structures. Sonar systems frequently make use of resonant transducers, such as sandwich transducers, for acoustic wave generation and this principle has been used to excite waves in a rail. This paper compares the two transduction approaches, for launching bending waves in rectangular waveguides, with numerical modeling. The numerical modeling combined a waveguide finite element model, of the waveguide, with conventional three-dimensional piezoelectric finite element models of the transducers. The waveguide finite elements were formulated using a complex exponential to describe the wave propagation along the structure and conventional finite element interpolation over the area of the element. Consequently, only a two-dimensional finite element mesh covering the cross-section of the waveguide is required. The harmonic forced response of the waveguide was used to compute a complex dynamic stiffness matrix which represented the waveguide in the transducer model. The effects of geometrical parameters of patch and sandwich transducers were considered before the comparison was made. It appears that piezoelectric patch transducers offer advantages at low frequencies while sandwich transducers are superior at high frequencies, where resonance can be exploited, at the cost of more complex design.

[1]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[2]  G. P. Gibbs,et al.  Excitation of thin beams using asymmetric piezoelectric actuators , 1991 .

[3]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Forced response of a cylindrical waveguide with simulation of the wavenumber extraction problem , 2004 .

[4]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Standing on the shoulders of giants: An example of guided wave inspection , 2002 .

[5]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Propagating and evanescent elastic waves in cylindrical waveguides of arbitrary cross section , 2004 .

[6]  L. Gavric Computation of propagative waves in free rail using a finite element technique , 1995 .

[7]  P.W. Loveday,et al.  Analysis of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducers Attached to Waveguides Using Waveguide Finite Elements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  J. Rose,et al.  Guided wave dispersion curves for a bar with an arbitrary cross-section, a rod and rail example. , 2003, Ultrasonics.

[9]  T. Hughes,et al.  Finite element method for piezoelectric vibration , 1970 .

[10]  Colin H. Hansen,et al.  Active control of vibration , 1996 .

[11]  Philip W. Loveday,et al.  Finite element computation of dispersion in piezoelectric waveguides , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[12]  Philip W. Loveday,et al.  Development of piezoelectric transducers for a railway integrity monitoring system , 2000, Smart Structures.