Quantitative analysis of the fall-risk assessment test with wearable inertia sensors

We performed a quantitative analysis of the fall-risk assessment test using a wearable inertia sensor focusing on two tests: the time up and go (TUG) test and the four square step test (FSST). These tests consist of various daily activities, such as sitting, standing, walking, stepping, and turning. The TUG test was performed by subjects at low and high fall risk, while FSST was performed by healthy elderly and hemiplegic patients with high fall risk. In general, the total performance time of activities was evaluated. Clinically, it is important to evaluate each activity for further training and management. The wearable sensor consisted of an accelerometer and angular velocity sensor. The angular velocity and angle of pitch direction were used for TUG evaluation, and those in the pitch and yaw directions at the thigh were used for FSST. Using the threshold of the angular velocity signal, we classified the phase corresponding to each activity. We then observed the characteristics of each activity and recommended suitable training and management. The wearable sensor can be used for more detailed evaluation in fall risk management. The wearable sensor can be used more detailed evaluation for fall-risk management test.

[1]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[2]  M. Sekine,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[4]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Clinical Identification of Multiple Fall Risk Early After Unilateral Transtibial Amputation , 2008 .

[6]  F. Horak,et al.  iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Patrick J Sparto,et al.  The reliability and validity of the Four Square Step Test for people with balance deficits secondary to a vestibular disorder. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Barry R. Greene,et al.  Quantitative Falls Risk Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go Test , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Jannette M Blennerhassett,et al.  The Four Square Step Test is a feasible and valid clinical test of dynamic standing balance for use in ambulant people poststroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Wayne Dite,et al.  A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.