An Integrated Toolbox for the Engagement of Citizens in the Monitoring of Water Ecosystems

The monitoring of water ecosystems requires consistent and accurate sensor measurements, usually provided from traditional in-situ environmental monitoring systems. Such infrastructure, however, is expensive, hard to maintain and available only in limited areas that had been affected by extreme phenomena and require continuous monitoring. Due to climate change, the monitoring of larger areas and extended water ecosystems is imperative, raising the question of whether this monitoring can be disengaged from the in-situ monitoring systems. Due to climate change and extreme weather phenomena, more citizens are affected by environmental issues and become aware of the need to contribute to their monitoring. As a result, they are willing to offer their time to support the collection of scientific data. Collecting such data from volunteers, with no technical knowledge and while using low-cost equipment such as smart phones and portable sensors, raises the question of data quality and consistency. We present here a novel integrated toolbox that can support the organization of crowd-sourcing activities, ensure the engagement of the participants, the data collection in a consistent way, enforce extensive data quality controls and provide to local authorities and scientists access to the collected information in a uniform way, through widely accepted standards.

[1]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[2]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  B. L. Welch ON THE COMPARISON OF SEVERAL MEAN VALUES: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH , 1951 .

[4]  Sven Schade,et al.  Next Generation Air Quality Platform: Openness and Interoperability for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[5]  G. Ottinger Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science , 2010 .

[6]  K. Oberg,et al.  Measuring river velocity and discharge with acoustic Doppler profilers , 2002 .

[7]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer Interaction , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[9]  Anne M. Land-Zandstra,et al.  Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[10]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  T. Mierlo The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study , 2014 .

[12]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[13]  J. R. Taylor,et al.  Automated quality control methods for sensor data: a novel observatory approach , 2012 .

[14]  Carl F. Salk,et al.  Comparing the Quality of Crowdsourced Data Contributed by Expert and Non-Experts , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  N. Justin Marshall,et al.  CoralWatch: education, monitoring, and sustainability through citizen science , 2012 .

[16]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[17]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement , 2012 .

[18]  R. Hotchkiss,et al.  Evaluating velocity measurement techniques in shallow streams , 2007 .

[19]  Kirsty J. Park,et al.  Using citizen science to monitor Bombus populations in the UK: nesting ecology and relative abundance in the urban environment , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[20]  R. Levy,et al.  Impact of California Fires on Local and Regional Air Quality: The Role of a Low‐Cost Sensor Network and Satellite Observations , 2018, GeoHealth.

[21]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[22]  Celia A. Evans,et al.  The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen‐Science Ecological Research Project , 2005 .

[23]  Melinda Laituri,et al.  Teaching Citizen Science Skills Online: Implications for Invasive Species Training Programs , 2010 .

[24]  E. Forgy,et al.  Cluster analysis of multivariate data : efficiency versus interpretability of classifications , 1965 .

[25]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs , 2012 .

[26]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[27]  P. Jones,et al.  Multi‐century trends to wetter winters and drier summers in the England and Wales precipitation series explained by observational and sampling bias in early records , 2019, International journal of climatology : a journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.