The Gordian Knot of Agency—Structure in International Relations:

The agent-structure debate has proceeded in International Relations for some time now. Within an initial `first wave' of debate, this revolved around proposing various `solutions' to the problem of how to appreciate the mutually constitutive relationship between agency and structure. The ensuing debate was then characterized by an apparent intellectual cul-de-sac. There were always `two stories to tell' about agency and structure — one an explanatory account, the other an interpretative account. More recently, a `second wave' of agent-structure debate is under way in which the stakes have been raised. Yet throughout the various waves of debate it seems that the contributions of an historicist neo-Gramscian perspective developed by Robert Cox have been overlooked. This article explores some of the issues raised by such an approach. Attention is drawn to the many issues developed by neo-Gramscian perspectives that combine accounts of agency-structure as well as modes of explanation and understanding. We remain sceptical about whether the dualism of agency-structure can be successfully transcended by combining accounts that both explain and understand the social world. As such, the problem of agency-structure may well be a Gordian knot that cannot be unravelled or solved. Yet, by starting to take seriously the approaches to agency-structure within various neo-Gramscian perspectives, we aim to propel discussion into further avenues within the second wave of the agent-structure debate.

[1]  R. Doty.  A Reply to Colin Wight , 1999 .

[2]  Martin Hollis,et al.  Explaining and Understanding International Relations , 1990 .

[3]  R. Cox,et al.  International political economy : understanding global disorder , 1997 .

[4]  M. Hollis,et al.  A response: why epistemology matters in international theory , 1996, Review of International Studies.

[5]  M. Hollis,et al.  Two stories about structure and agency , 1994, Review of International Studies.

[6]  O. Holman.  Integrating Southern Europe: EC Expansion and the Transnationalization of Spain , 1996 .

[7]  Vivienne Jabri,et al.  The ontologist always rings twice: two more stones about structure and agency in reply to Hollis and Smith , 1996, Review of International Studies.

[8]  Deborah Stienstra.  Women's movements and international organizations , 1994 .

[9]  Alexander Wendt.  Levels of analysis vs. agents and structures: part III , 1992 .

[10]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  The agent-structure problem in international relations theory , 1987, International Organization.

[11]  N. Onuf,et al.  World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations , 1992 .

[12]  M. Rupert.  (Re)Politicizing the global economy: Liberal common sense and ideological struggle in the US NAFTA debate , 1995 .

[13]  W. Clark.  Agents and Structures: Two Views of Preferences, Two Views of Institutions , 1998 .

[14]  R. Cox.  Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory , 1981, Culture, Ideology, and World Order.

[15]  S. Whitworth.  Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-Governmental Institutions , 1994 .

[16]  Nicholas Onuf,et al.  Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony , 1996 .

[17]  Walter Carlsnaes.  The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis , 1992 .

[18]  Steve Smith.  Wendt's world , 2000, Review of International Studies.

[19]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  International Institutions And State Power: Essays In International Relations Theory , 1989 .

[20]  Stephen D. Krasner,et al.  International Organization and the Study of World Politics , 1998, International Organization.

[21]  Alexander Wendt.  On the Via Media: a response to the critics , 2000, Review of International Studies.

[22]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  On constitution and causation in International Relations , 1998, Review of International Studies.

[23]  Stephen Gill,et al.  American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission , 1990 .

[24]  C. Wight.  They Shoot Dead Horses Don't They? , 1999 .

[25]  Mark Rupert,et al.  Producing hegemony : the politics of mass production and American global power , 1997 .

[26]  Charles Klopp,et al.  Letters from Prison , 1989 .

[27]  Stephen R. Gill,et al.  The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies , 1988 .

[28]  K. Pijl.  Transnational classes and international relations , 1998 .

[29]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics , 1992, International Organization.

[30]  Stephen Gill,et al.  Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital , 1989 .

[31]  Jennifer Sterling-Folker,et al.  Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared , 2000 .

[32]  Quintin Hoare,et al.  Selections from Political Writings, 1910-1920 , 1978 .

[33]  Coxian Historicism as an Alternative Perspective in International Studies , 1998 .

[34]  Derek Boothman,et al.  Further selections from the prison notebooks , 1995 .

[35]  G. Stoker,et al.  Theory and Methods in Political Science , 1995 .

[36]  Alexander Wendt.  Bridging the theory/meta-theory gap in international relations , 1991, Review of International Studies.

[37]  David Dessler.  What's at stake in the agent-structure debate? , 1989, International Organization.

[38]  Alexander Wendt.  Social Theory of International Politics: “Ideas all the way down?”: on the constitution of power and interest , 1999 .

[39]  Interpretation All the Way Down? , 2000 .

[40]  Bill Mcsweeney.  Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations , 1999 .

[41]  Antonio Gramsci.  Selections from the prison notebooks , 2020, The Applied Theatre Reader.

[42]  John Gerard Ruggie,et al.  Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalisation , 1998 .

[43]  T. G. Bergin,et al.  The New Science of Giambattista Vico , 1950 .

[44]  P. Langley,et al.  Paths to a historicized international political economy , 2000 .

[45]  Kenneth N. Waltz,et al.  Theory of International Politics , 1979 .

[46]  A. Bieler.  Globalisation and Enlargement of the European Union: Austrian and Swedish Social Forces in the Struggle over Membership , 2000 .

[47]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  Hierarchy under anarchy: informal empire and the East German state , 1995, International Organization.

[48]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[49]  Robert W. Cox,et al.  Approaches to world order , 1996 .

[50]  Stephen R. Gill.  Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism , 1995 .

[51]  Alexander Wendt.  Collective Identity Formation and the International State , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[52]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realist social theory: The morphogenetic cycle , 1997 .

[53]  V. Kubálková.  International Relations in a Constructed World , 1998 .

[54]  Alexander Wendt.  Constructing International Politics , 1995 .

[55]  A. Morton,et al.  Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe: The Restructuring of European Social Relations in the Global Political Economy , 2001 .

[56]  C. Hay,et al.  Introduction: Towards a new (international) political economy? , 1999 .

[57]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[58]  John Macmillan,et al.  Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations , 1995 .

[59]  R. Doty.  Aporia:: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory , 1997 .

[60]  J. Rosenau,et al.  Global changes and theoretical challenges : approaches to world politics for the 1990s , 1989 .

[61]  G. Tagliacozzo.  Vico and Marx: Affinities and Contrasts , 1983 .

[62]  Michael Kenny,et al.  Engaging Gramsci: international relations theory and the new Gramscians , 1998, Review of International Studies.

[63]  F. Kratochwil,et al.  Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs , 1989 .

[64]  Robert W. Cox,et al.  Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method , 1983 .

[65]  R. Cox.  Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, Robert W. Cox. 1987. Columbia University Press, New York. 500 pages. Index. ISBN: 0-231-05808-X. $45.00 , 1988 .

[66]  Hidemi Suganami.  Agents, Structures, Narratives , 1999 .

[67]  Stephen R. Gill.  Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations: Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations , 1993 .

[68]  Stuart Hall.  The Problem of Ideology-Marxism without Guarantees , 1986 .

[69]  Jon Clark,et al.  Anthony Giddens : consensus and controversy , 1991 .

[70]  M. Hollis,et al.  Beware of gurus: structure and action In International relations , 1991, Review of International Studies.