Modelling intervention options to reduce GHG emissions in housing stock — A diffusion approach

Abstract The building sector is regarded as having one of the highest benefit–cost ratios from greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction strategies. However, because of uncertainties around household behaviour patterns, it is very difficult to assess and compare the GHG reduction impacts of different intervention schemes for whole housing stock. Intervention schemes include policy instruments such as incentives or rebates for energy efficient appliances or renewable energy, and regulatory building code requirements for energy efficiency. This paper presents a decision support tool based on mathematical diffusion that evaluates the adoption levels of different schemes or pathways towards reducing GHG emissions in housing stock. It is an extension of the Bass diffusion model that accommodates financial and non-financial benefits, ceilings of adoption and interactions between intervention options. The model capability was tested using a case study of seven suburbs in Brisbane, Australia, comprising of 25,000 houses and units. Estimates of GHG emission reductions to 2019 of a household rebate scheme for solar panels and a rebate scheme for solar hot water compared to a base case of no rebates were presented and analysed. Modelling also allowed identification of important characteristics of adoption trends that could assist policy makers and industry to substantially improve the design of effective intervention options.

[1]  S. Svendsen,et al.  Residential and commercial buildings , 2012 .

[2]  S. Kalish.  A New Product Adoption Model with Price, Advertising, and Uncertainty , 1985 .

[3]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  Demand forecasting for multigenerational products combining discrete choice and dynamics of diffusion under technological trajectories , 2005 .

[4]  Bruce R. Robinson,et al.  Dynamic Price Models for New-Product Planning , 1975 .

[5]  Alan S. Fung,et al.  Modelling of residential energy consumption at the national level , 2003 .

[6]  Robert Lowe,et al.  An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year 2050 , 2005 .

[7]  H. Hens,et al.  Impact of energy efficiency measures on the CO2 emissions in the residential sector, a large scale analysis , 2001 .

[8]  Chul-Yong Lee,et al.  Forecasting future demand for large-screen television sets using conjoint analysis with diffusion model , 2006 .

[9]  Yuguo Li,et al.  Prediction of natural ventilation in buildings with large openings , 2000 .

[10]  Effect of price on the demand for durables: Modelling, estimation and findings: D.C. Jain and R.C. Rao, Journals of Business and Economics Statistics 8, no. 2 (1990) 163–170☆ , 1990 .

[11]  Christian Terwiesch,et al.  Managing Demand and Sales Dynamics in New Product Diffusion Under Supply Constraint , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[12]  D. Jain,et al.  Effect of Price on the Demand for Durables: Modeling, Estimation, and Findings , 1990 .

[13]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Energy efficient modernisation of housing: a UK case study , 2000 .

[14]  Aldo Goia,et al.  Demographic processes in a model of innovation diffusion with dynamic market , 2007 .

[15]  Lei Shi,et al.  Competitive Advertising Strategies and Market-Size Dynamics: A Research Note on Theory and Evidence , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  M. N. Sharif,et al.  Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population , 1981 .

[17]  Sukumar Natarajan,et al.  Domestic futures--Which way to a low-carbon housing stock? , 2007 .

[18]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[19]  D. Horsky.  A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits, Price, Income and Information , 1990 .

[20]  Peter Lund,et al.  Market penetration rates of new energy technologies , 2006 .

[21]  E. Mansfield.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[22]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  Dennis Fok,et al.  Forecasting cross-population innovation diffusion: A Bayesian approach , 2005 .

[24]  S. Chun,et al.  A diffusion model for products with indirect network externalities , 2008 .

[25]  Sukumar Natarajan,et al.  Predicting future UK housing stock and carbon emissions , 2007 .

[26]  F. Bass,et al.  A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products , 1987 .