Anomaly detection using background prediction in hyperspectral images

Anomaly detections in hyperspectral images are of great importance in a variety of applications such as military reconnaissance, scene classification, and disaster evaluation, etc. Most interferences in anomaly detection are generated by inhomogeneous background in practical applications. Therefore, many researchers resort to Gaussian mixture model by classifying inhomogeneous background into numbers of homogenous regions. However, the model might not perform well as anomalies presented locally. Thus, we propose a new anomaly detection approach by introducing background prediction to suppress the interferences of background. Firstly, a conventional background prediction model named two-dimensional least mean square (TDLMS) filter is applied on each spectral image. Since anomalies have distinct spectral signatures from their surrounding background pixels, they will be suppressed in the background prediction process. Next, a residual image is obtained by subtracting the predicted background from the original hyperspectral image. And the background in original image will be extremely eliminated while the anomalies are well preserved in the residual image. Finally, the conventional RX algorithm is used to detect the anomalies in the residual image. We test the new algorithm via two real hyperspectral subimages. The experimental results show that background prediction can suppress the interferences of background effectively and improve the detection performance of the RX algorithm.

[1]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery: a comparison of methods using seasonal data , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Bradley S. Denney,et al.  Optimal point target detection using adaptive auto regressive background prediction , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Mark J. Carlotto,et al.  A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  David W. Thomas,et al.  The two-dimensional adaptive LMS (TDLMS) algorithm , 1988 .

[5]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Spectral Imaging for Remote Sensing , 2003 .

[6]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[7]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  S Matteoli,et al.  A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images , 2010, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[9]  Christopher J. Willis Mixture models for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, SPIE Security + Defence.

[10]  Marco Diani,et al.  Gaussian mixture model based approach to anomaly detection in multi/hyperspectral images , 2005, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[11]  M. Griffin,et al.  Compensation of Hyperspectral Data for Atmospheric Effects , 2003 .

[12]  C. D. Wang Adaptive Spatial/Temporal/Spectral Filters For Background Clutter Suppression And Target Detection , 1982 .

[13]  Robert W. Basedow,et al.  HYDICE system: implementation and performance , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[16]  Edward A. Ashton,et al.  Detection of subpixel anomalies in multispectral infrared imagery using an adaptive Bayesian classifier , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..