Effect of Presbyopic Vision Corrections on Perceptions of Driving Difficulty

Objectives As the population ages, more people will be wearing presbyopic vision corrections when driving. However, little is known about the impact of these vision corrections on driving performance. This study aimed to determine the subjective driving difficulties experienced when wearing a range of common presbyopic contact lens and spectacle corrections. Methods A questionnaire was developed and piloted that included a series of items regarding difficulties experienced while driving under daytime and nighttime conditions (rated on five-point and seven-point Likert scales). Participants included 255 presbyopic patients recruited through local optometry practices. Participants were categorized into five age-matched groups; including those wearing no vision correction for driving (n = 50), bifocal spectacles (n = 54), progressive spectacles (n = 50), monovision contact lenses (n = 53), and multifocal contact lenses (n = 48). Results Overall, ratings of satisfaction during daytime driving were relatively high for all correction types. However, multifocal contact lens wearers were significantly less satisfied with aspects of their vision during nighttime than daytime driving, particularly regarding disturbances from glare and haloes. Progressive spectacle lens wearers noticed more distortion of peripheral vision, whereas bifocal spectacle wearers reported more difficulties with tasks requiring changes of focus and those who wore no optical correction for driving reported problems with intermediate and near tasks. Overall, satisfaction was significantly higher for progressive spectacles than bifocal spectacles for driving. Conclusions Subjective visual experiences of different presbyopic vision corrections when driving vary depending on the vision tasks and lighting level. Eye-care practitioners should be aware of the driving-related difficulties experienced with each vision correction type and the need to select corrective types that match the driving needs of their patients.

[1]  M. Babizhayev.  Glare Disability and Driving Safety , 2003, Ophthalmic Research.

[2]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Darryl J Meister,et al.  Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 1: Design and development of progressive lenses , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[4]  S. Lord,et al.  Multifocal Glasses Impair Edge‐Contrast Sensitivity and Depth Perception and Increase the Risk of Falls in Older People , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  P Erickson,et al.  Visual Function with Presbyopic Contact Lens Correction , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  Eric B. Papas,et al.  Monovision vs. soft diffractive bifocal contact lenses: A crossover study , 1990 .

[7]  G. Haegerstrom‐Portnoy.  The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture 2003: Vision in Elders—Summary of Findings of the SKI Study , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  Aruna S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Visual Performance of Subjects Wearing Presbyopic Contact Lenses , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Michael Perel,et al.  Relation Between Glare and Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[10]  S. Jain,et al.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. , 1996, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  P. Morgan,et al.  Contact lens correction of presbyopia. , 2009, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[12]  C STEVEN BAILEY,et al.  Contact Lens Complications , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Kamilla RUN JOHANNSDOTTIR,et al.  Monovision: a Review of the Scientific Literature , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  M. Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: the relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Jane F. Koretz,et al.  The mechanism of presbyopia , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[16]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  J. Wood,et al.  Aging, driving and vision , 2002, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[18]  P. Davison.  INTER‐RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BRITISH DRIVERS‘ VISUAL ABILITIES, AGE AND ROAD ACCIDENT HISTORIES , 1985, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[19]  Nathan Efron,et al.  A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996-2005). , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[20]  Charman Wn.  Theoretical aspects of concentric varifocal lenses. , 1982 .

[21]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Optics of Progressive Addition Lenses , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[22]  Garth Stevens,et al.  Bifocal/varifocal spectacles, lighting and missed-step accidents , 2001 .

[23]  L. Stark,et al.  Eye‐Head Coordination with Laterally “Modulated” Gaze Field , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[24]  Ronald Klein,et al.  Changes in visual acuity in a population over a 15-year period: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Correlation Analysis of the Optics of Progressive Addition Lenses , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  A Back,et al.  Comparative Visual Performance of Three Presbyopic Contact Lens Corrections , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001 .

[28]  Joanne M Wood,et al.  The effect of monovision contact lens wear on driving performance , 1998, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[29]  K J Bowman,et al.  Peripheral Visual Acuity with Monovision and Other Contact Lens Corrections for Presbyopia , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  B. Koffler.  Management of Presbyopia with Soft Contact Lenses , 2002, Ophthalmologica.

[31]  Len Roberts.  The Driving , 2011 .

[32]  N Stamatiadis,et al.  Trends in highway safety: effects of an aging population on accident propensity. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Werner Adler,et al.  Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC® 6500: influence of age and glare , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[34]  B. Hills.  Vision, Visibility, and Perception in Driving , 1980, Perception.

[35]  C. Hutnik,et al.  Multifocal contact lenses--look again! , 1997, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[36]  L. Vijaya,et al.  Comparison of refractive errors and factors associated with spectacle use in a rural and urban South Indian population , 2008, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  M. Campbell,et al.  Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age , 1998, Vision Research.

[38]  Analysis of a progressive addition lens population , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[39]  T. Lewis.  DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT IN VISION CARE , 1988 .

[40]  P. Erickson,et al.  Stereopsis in Presbyopes Wearing Monovision and Simultaneous Vision Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[41]  M. Miranda,et al.  The geographic factor in the onset of presbyopia. , 1979, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[42]  W W Wierwille,et al.  AUTOMOTIVE ERGONOMICS. CHAPTER 14. VISUAL AND MANUAL DEMANDS OF IN- CAR CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS , 1993 .

[43]  Ying Han,et al.  Dynamic interactions of eye and head movements when reading with single-vision and progressive lenses in a simulated computer-based environment. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  Kenneth J Ciuffreda,et al.  Assessing Visual Performance with Progressive Addition Lenses , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[45]  G. Mitchell,et al.  Comparison of Multifocal and Monovision Soft Contact Lens Corrections in Patients With Low-Astigmatic Presbyopia , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[46]  Irene Gottlob,et al.  Physiology and pathology of eye–head coordination , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[47]  P. Cho,et al.  A market survey of contact lens practice in Hong Kong , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[48]  Brian Brown,et al.  Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.