The Database for Reaching Experiments and Models

Reaching is one of the central experimental paradigms in the field of motor control, and many computational models of reaching have been published. While most of these models try to explain subject data (such as movement kinematics, reaching performance, forces, etc.) from only a single experiment, distinct experiments often share experimental conditions and record similar kinematics. This suggests that reaching models could be applied to (and falsified by) multiple experiments. However, using multiple datasets is difficult because experimental data formats vary widely. Standardizing data formats promises to enable scientists to test model predictions against many experiments and to compare experimental results across labs. Here we report on the development of a new resource available to scientists: a database of reaching called the Database for Reaching Experiments And Models (DREAM). DREAM collects both experimental datasets and models and facilitates their comparison by standardizing formats. The DREAM project promises to be useful for experimentalists who want to understand how their data relates to models, for modelers who want to test their theories, and for educators who want to help students better understand reaching experiments, models, and data analysis.

[1]  J. Wicherts,et al.  Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  T. Milner,et al.  Functionally Specific Changes in Resting-State Sensorimotor Networks after Motor Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Konrad P. Kording,et al.  Generalization of Stochastic Visuomotor Rotations , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[5]  David J Ostry,et al.  Modifiability of generalization in dynamics learning. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Measuring Generalization of Visuomotor Perturbations in Wrist Movements Using Mobile Phones , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Rapid Reshaping of Human Motor Generalization , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Real-time fusion of gaze and EMG for a reaching neuroprosthesis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Marc W Slutzky,et al.  Statistical assessment of the stability of neural movement representations. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L. Miller,et al.  Accurate decoding of reaching movements from field potentials in the absence of spikes , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  S. Scott,et al.  Dissociation between hand motion and population vectors from neural activity in motor cortex , 2022 .

[13]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Kunlin Wei,et al.  The nervous system uses nonspecific motor learning in response to random perturbations of varying nature. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Estimating the Relevance of World Disturbances to Explain Savings, Interference and Long-Term Motor Adaptation Effects , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Tom Chau,et al.  Target-Directed Movements at a Comfortable Pace: Movement Duration and Fitts's Law , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  J. Patton,et al.  Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[19]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Multi-Sensory Weights Depend on Contextual Noise in Reference Frame Transformations , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Jeremy D Wong,et al.  Somatosensory Plasticity and Motor Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.