Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria for the Concept Evaluation Task

I. Abstract—Ontological concept evaluation is a difficult task. Till now, it is done either by domain expert or a knowledge base (thesaurus, ontology, etc.). In this research, we propose a new evaluation method based on a large web document collection, several context definitions deduced from it and three criteria. It provides a support for either a domain expert or a novice user. Moreover, it facilitates the semantic interpretation of the word clusters and consequently the ontological concept generation. Our contribution is to propose an evaluation framework that does not depend on a gold standard, could be applied to any domain even if expert intervention is not available and provides qualitative and quantitative criteria. Our experiments show how our method assists and facilitates the evaluation task for the domain expert.

[1]  Paola Velardi,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of the OntoLearn Ontology Learning System , 2004, COLING.

[2]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Data Driven Ontology Evaluation , 2004, LREC.

[3]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A collaborative approach to ontology design , 2002, CACM.

[4]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[7]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Meaning from the Web , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[8]  Nacéra Bennacer,et al.  A New Extraction Concept Based on Contextual Clustering , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Computational Inteligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and International Commerce (CIMCA'06).