Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

In the present study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the influence of phonological and lexical properties of verbal items on the excitability of the tongue's cortical motor representation during passive listening. In particular, we aimed to clarify if the difference in tongue motor excitability found during listening to words and pseudo-words [Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., Rizzolatti, G., 2002. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15, 399-402] is due to lexical frequency or to the presence of a meaning per se. In order to do this, we investigated the time-course of tongue motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during listening to frequent words, rare words, and pseudo-words embedded with a double consonant requiring relevant tongue movements for its pronunciation. Results showed that at the later stimulation intervals (200 and 300 ms from the double consonant) listening to rare words evoked much larger MEPs than listening to frequent words. Moreover, by comparing pseudo-words embedded with a double consonant requiring or not tongue movements, we found that a pure phonological motor resonance was present only 100 ms after the double consonant. Thus, while the phonological motor resonance appears very early, the lexical-dependent motor facilitation takes more time to appear and depends on the frequency of the stimuli. The present results indicate that the motor system responsible for phonoarticulatory movements during speech production is also involved during speech listening in a strictly specific way. This motor facilitation reflects both the difference in the phonoarticulatory characteristics and the difference in the frequency of occurrence of the verbal material.

[1]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Frequency of Concrete Words Modulates Prefrontal Activation during Semantic Judgments , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[3]  M. Rugg,et al.  Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[4]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[5]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perception of Synthesized Audible and Visible Speech , 1990 .

[6]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[8]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[9]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the relation of speech to language , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[13]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[14]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[15]  Harvey M. Sussman Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: human language analogs to the barn owl. , 1989 .

[16]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[17]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  C. Fiebach,et al.  fMRI Evidence for Dual Routes to the Mental Lexicon in Visual Word Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Bruce W. Smith,et al.  The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: The role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[21]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .