Factors that impact turnaround time of surgical pathology specimens in an academic institution.

Turnaround time of laboratory results is important for customer satisfaction. The College of American Pathologists' checklist requires an analytic turnaround time of 2 days or less for most routine cases and lets every hospital define what a routine specimen is. The objective of this study was to analyze which factors impact turnaround time of nonbiopsy surgical pathology specimens. We calculated the turnaround time from receipt to verification of results (adjusted for weekends and holidays) for all nonbiopsy surgical specimens during a 2-week period. Factors studied included tissue type, number of slides per case, decalcification, immunohistochemistry, consultations with other pathologists, and diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 713 specimens were analyzed, 551 (77%) were verified within 2 days and 162 (23%) in 3 days or more. Lung, gastrointestinal, breast, and genitourinary specimens showed the highest percentage of cases being signed out in over 3 days. Diagnosis of malignancy (including staging of the neoplasia), consultation with other pathologists, having had a frozen section, and use of immunohistochemical stains were significantly associated with increased turnaround time in univariate analysis. Decalcification was not associated with increased turnaround time. In multivariate analysis, consultation with other pathologists, use of immunohistochemistry, diagnosis of malignancy, and the number of slides studied continued to be significantly associated with prolonged turnaround time. Our findings suggest that diagnosis of malignancy is central to significantly prolonging the turnaround time for surgical pathology specimens, thus institutions that serve cancer centers will have longer turnaround time than those that do not.

[1]  P J Howanitz,et al.  Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  Richard J Zarbo,et al.  Customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 3065 physician surveys from 94 laboratories. , 2003, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  Raouf E Nakhleh,et al.  Core Components of a Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program in Anatomic Pathology , 2009, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[4]  Richard J. Zarbo,et al.  Customer Satisfaction in Anatomic Pathology , 2009 .

[5]  R Long,et al.  Use and abuse. , 1978, Nursing times.

[6]  A. Garvin,et al.  mhatomic pathology turnaround times. Use and abuse. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  A. Cardesa,et al.  Evaluation of turnaround times as a component of quality assurance in surgical pathology. , 1998, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  Richard J Zarbo,et al.  Determining customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  Rhona J. Souers,et al.  Physician satisfaction with surgical pathology reports: a 2-year College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks Study. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  Smith Mt,et al.  mhatomic pathology turnaround times. Use and abuse. , 1996 .

[11]  J. Hayman,et al.  Departmental audit in surgical anatomical pathology , 1997, Pathology.

[12]  R. Nakhleh,et al.  What is quality in surgical pathology? , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[13]  K. Coard,et al.  Turnaround time in the surgical pathology laboratory. , 1999, The West Indian medical journal.

[14]  J C Kazzi,et al.  Turnaround times for reports on uncomplicated biopsies in five major anatomical pathology laboratories in NSW, Australia. , 1999, Pathology.

[15]  R. Zarbo,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.