A blueprint for the implementation of a validated approach for the detection of SARS-Cov2 in clinical samples in academic facilities

The COVID-19 pandemic is expanding at an unprecedented rate. As a result, diagnostic services are stretched to their limit, and there is a clear need for the provision of additional diagnostic capacity. Academic laboratories, many of which are closed due to governmental lockdowns, may be in a position to support local screening capacity by adapting their current laboratory practices. Here, we describe the process of developing a SARS-Cov2 diagnostic workflow in a conventional academic Containment Level 2 (CL2) laboratory. Our outline includes simple SARS-Cov2 deactivation upon contact, the methods for a quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) detecting SARS-Cov2, a description of process establishment and validation, and some considerations for establishing a similar workflow elsewhere. This was achieved under challenging circumstances through the collaborative efforts of scientists, clinical staff, and diagnostic staff to mitigate to the ongoing crisis. Within 14 days, we created a validated COVID-19 diagnostics service for healthcare workers in our local hospital. The described methods are not exhaustive, but we hope may offer support to other academic groups aiming to set up something comparable in a short time frame.

[1]  Eurosurveillance Editorial Team Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[2]  P. Horby,et al.  COVID-19 and risks to the supply and quality of tests, drugs, and vaccines , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[3]  Scott Tighe,et al.  Direct RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from patient nasopharyngeal swabs without an RNA extraction step , 2020, PLoS biology.

[4]  E. Goudouris Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 , 2020, Jornal de Pediatria.

[5]  Jonathan E. Schmitz,et al.  Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  Scott Tighe,et al.  DIRECT RT-qPCR DETECTION OF SARS-CoV-2 RNA FROM PATIENT NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS WITHOUT AN RNA EXTRACTION STEP , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  X. de Lamballerie,et al.  Evaluation of heating and chemical protocols for inactivating SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  J O Westgard,et al.  Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection. , 1977, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  M. Salimans,et al.  Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  A blueprint for the implementation of a validated approach for the detection of SARS-Cov2 in clinical samples in academic facilities. , 2020, Wellcome open research.

[11]  A. Schuchat,et al.  COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic , 2020, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Vollmar,et al.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 , 2020, Nature.

[13]  Eurosurveillance Editorial Team Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[14]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[15]  E R JENNINGS,et al.  The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. , 1950, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Challenges for NHS hospitals during covid-19 epidemic , 2020, BMJ.