Nonlinear Semi-active Damping using Constant or Adaptive Voltage Sources: A Stability Analysis

Semi-active vibration control techniques by nonlinear treatment have experienced strong development these last years, due to their effectiveness and advantages compared to passive and active approaches. In particular, the Synchronized Switch Damping (SSD) technique leads to very effective attenuation. This technique consists of a nonlinear processing of the piezovoltage that induces great enlargement of the electromechanical energy conversion. The SSD technique can be improved by switching on continuous voltage sources (SSDV), leading to an enlargement of the conversion energy cycle. This method is almost as effective as active techniques, but might generate instabilities. This article deals with these particular problems, focusing on CICO stability (Converging Input, Converging Output) and robustness. The study considers a theoretical and a technological point of view, confirmed by experimental results. The article also considers an enhanced SSDV, which uses matched continuous voltage sources, whereas the classical SSDV uses constant voltage sources. Simple monomodal and multimodal models of an electromechanical vibrating structure are proposed. Stability and robustness are discussed for the classical and enhanced SSDV techniques using the first harmonic method. It is shown both theoretically and experimentally that the enhanced SSDV is much more stable than the classical SSDV.

[1]  Daniel Guyomar,et al.  Semi-passive damping using continuous switching of a piezoelectric device , 1999, Smart Structures.

[2]  Adrien Badel,et al.  Nonlinear semi-passive multimodal vibration damping: An efficient probabilistic approach , 2006 .

[3]  Peter H. Rogers,et al.  State switched transducers: A new approach to high-power, low-frequency, underwater projectors , 1998 .

[4]  C Richard,et al.  Wave reflection and transmission reduction using a piezoelectric semipassive nonlinear technique. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Adrien Badel,et al.  Semi-passive Piezoelectric Structural Damping by Synchronized Switching on Voltage Sources , 2006 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Cunefare,et al.  State-Switched Absorber for Vibration Control of Point-Excited Beams , 2000, Adaptive Structures and Material Systems.

[7]  Claude Richard,et al.  Enhanced semi-passive damping using continuous switching of a piezoelectric device on an inductor , 2000, Smart Structures.

[8]  William W. Clark,et al.  Energy Dissipation Analysis of Piezoceramic Semi-Active Vibration Control , 2001 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Cunefare,et al.  Damping Effects on the State-Switched Absorber Used for Vibration Suppression , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel Viault,et al.  Systèmes non linéaires - Méthode du premier harmonique , 2015, Automatique et ingénierie système.

[11]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  Stability of a Class of Real-Time Switched Piezoelectric Shunts , 2002 .

[12]  N. Sadegh,et al.  State-Switched Absorber for Semi-Active Structural Control , 2000 .

[13]  J. Qiu,et al.  Piezoelectric vibration control by synchronized switching on adaptive voltage sources: Towards wideband semi-active damping , 2006 .

[14]  Adrien Badel,et al.  Finite Element and Simple Lumped Modeling for Flexural Nonlinear Semi-passive Damping , 2007 .

[15]  Cyril Buttay,et al.  Wave transmission reduction by a piezoelectric semi-passive technique , 2006 .

[16]  W. Clark Vibration Control with State-Switched Piezoelectric Materials , 2000 .