The Application of Innovative Automobile Maintenance Services from Customers’ Viewpoints: A Hybrid Method*

Company experts and academicianshave paid significant attention to issues of new product/service development. However, few studies have been carried outtodiscuss innovative product/service development mindful of the competitive positions between competitors. This study introduces a hybrid method of positioning analysis, conjoint analysis and rough set theory to understand the competition positions and facilitate innovative product/service development from the customers’ perspective. The hybrid method is also supported by in-depth interviewing, factor analysis, preference regression, ideas simulation, ideas selection, and specific weight valuation methods. We choose the automobile maintenance industry in Taiwan, whose objective is to improve product/service qualities and enhance customers’ satisfaction and loyalty.This is also the subject of our empirical study. The results show that the proposed hybrid method is effective for innovative product/service development. Moreover, the empirical findings provide useful information for automobile maintenance providers so that they may be better able to pay attention to their competitive positions and their customers’ preferences, and better able to facilitate their innovative automobile maintenance service development, in order to achieve sustainable competitive advantages.

[1]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[2]  M. Uysal,et al.  MARKET POSITIONING ANALYSIS: A Hybrid Approach , 2002 .

[3]  Ulrike de Brentani Innovative versus incremental new business services : Different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[4]  G. G. Merode,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to estimate employers preferences for key competencies of master level Dutch graduates entering the public health field , 2007 .

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  An integration method combining Rough Set Theory with formal concept analysis for personal investment portfolios , 2010, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Nick Cercone,et al.  A foundation of rough sets theoretical and computational hybrid intelligent system for survival analysis , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[8]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Strategic Positioning Analysis for Seaports , 2006 .

[10]  T.-S. Jan,et al.  A four-role model of the automotive industry development in developing countries: a case in Taiwan , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[12]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Does Innovativeness Moderate the Relationship between Cross-Functional Integration and Product Performance? , 2000 .

[13]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[14]  J. Weerawardena The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy , 2003 .

[15]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[16]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[17]  Nick Cercone,et al.  Integrating rough set theory and medical applications , 2008, Appl. Math. Lett..

[18]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Corporate Product Policy and Innovative Behavior of European and Japanese Multinationals: An Empirical Investigation , 1990 .

[19]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Orientation and Innovation , 1996 .

[20]  Carlos Serrano-Cinca,et al.  Internet positioning and performance of e-tailers: An empirical analysis , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[21]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[22]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Product Positioning Under Price Competition , 1990 .

[23]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[24]  Szymon Wilk,et al.  ROSE - Software Implementation of the Rough Set Theory , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[25]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Editorial: Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[26]  Liang Gao,et al.  An expert system using rough sets theory for aided conceptual design of ship's engine room automation , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Paul E. Green,et al.  An Application of a Product Positioning Model to Pharmaceutical Products , 1992 .