Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Selecting Treatment Words to Boost Phonological Learning.

Purpose Word selection has typically been thought of as an inactive ingredient in phonological treatment, but emerging evidence suggests that word selection is an active ingredient that can impact phonological learning. The goals of this tutorial are to (a) review the emerging single-subject evidence on the influence of word characteristics on phonological learning in clinical treatment, (b) outline hypotheses regarding the mechanism of action of word characteristics, and (c) provide resources to support clinicians incorporating word selection as an active ingredient in their approach to phonological treatment. Method Research demonstrating the influence of the word frequency, neighborhood density, age of acquisition, and lexicality of treatment stimuli on phonological learning is summarized. The mechanism of action for each characteristic is hypothesized. Methods from the research studies are used to create a free set of evidence-based treatment materials targeting most of the mid-8 and late-8 consonants. Results Clinicians have numerous evidence-based options to consider when selecting stimuli for phonological treatment including (a) high-frequency and high-density words, (b) low-frequency and high-density words, (c) high-frequency and mixed-density words, (d) low-frequency and late-acquired words, and (e) nonwords. Conclusion Incorporating word characteristics into phonological treatment may boost phonological learning. KU ScholarWorks Supplemental Material http://hdl.handle.net/1808/24768.

[1]  Monica L. Bellon-Harn,et al.  Scaffolded-Language Intervention , 2013 .

[2]  D. Howard,et al.  Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[4]  F. Cirrin,et al.  Lexical Search Speed in Children and Adults. , 1984 .

[5]  Thomas W. Powell,et al.  Planning for Phonological GeneralizationAn Approach to Treatment Target Selection , 1991 .

[6]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Phonological complexity and language learnability. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[7]  Andrew J Aschenbrenner,et al.  The effect of homonymy on learning correctly articulated versus misarticulated words. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[9]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Lexical organization and phonological change in treatment. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Jill R. Hoover,et al.  An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders. , 2010, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[13]  M. Vihman,et al.  Learning words and learning sounds: Advances in language development. , 2017, British journal of psychology.

[14]  Judith A. Gierut,et al.  Complexity in Phonological Treatment: Clinical Factors. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[15]  C. Frankish,et al.  Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Marlys A. Macken,et al.  The child's lexical representation: the ‘puzzle-puddle-pickle’ evidence , 1980, Journal of Linguistics.

[17]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Age of acquisition and meaningfulness as predictors of word availability. , 1985, The Journal of general psychology.

[18]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[19]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  Kathleen M. O'Connor,et al.  The puzzle-puddle-pickle problem and the Duke-of-York gambit in acquisition , 2001 .

[21]  Sharynne McLeod,et al.  Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 1 narrative review. , 2011, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[22]  Amanda C. Walley,et al.  Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability , 2003 .

[23]  Gary Weismer,et al.  The contribution of phonological, acoustic, and perceptual techniques to the characterization of a misarticulating child's voice contrast for stops , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children , 2016, Seminars in Speech and Language.

[25]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Lexicon-phonology relationships and dynamics of early language development--a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's 'Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children'. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[26]  J. H. Saxman,et al.  Acoustic validation of phonological knowledge and its relationship to treatment. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[27]  M. M. Allen,et al.  Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  A W Ellis,et al.  Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: a comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. , 2012, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[30]  Sharynne McLeod,et al.  Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 2 application to clinical practice. , 2011, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[31]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[32]  J. Gierut,et al.  Maximal opposition approach to phonological treatment. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[33]  J. Gierut,et al.  Comparability of Lexical Corpora: Word frequency in phonological generalization , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[34]  S. Curtin,et al.  Understanding the developing sound system: interactions between sounds and words. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[35]  G Weismer,et al.  A study of the voicing distinction associated with omitted, work-final stops. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[36]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Effect Size for Single-Subject Design in Phonological Treatment. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. , 1998 .

[38]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing in aphasia: a case study , 1994 .

[39]  John Whyte,et al.  Knowing What We're Doing: Why Specification of Treatment Methods Is Critical for Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology. , 2016, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[40]  Diane Frome Loeb,et al.  Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP survey results. , 2011 .

[41]  R G Schwartz,et al.  Converging evidence for underlying phonological representation in a child who misarticulates. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[42]  C. Stoel-Gammon Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[43]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[44]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Interpreting ‘phonetic interpretation’ over the lexicon , 2004 .

[45]  Suzanne Curtin,et al.  PRIMIR: A Developmental Framework of Infant Speech Processing , 2005 .

[46]  J. Gierut,et al.  Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  S. Roodenrys,et al.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords , 2002 .

[48]  Ulla Richardson,et al.  Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children’s short-term memory: Typical development and dyslexia , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Judith A. Gierut,et al.  On Word-Initial Voicing: Converging Sources of Evidence in Phonologically Disordered Speech , 1986, Language and speech.

[50]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition , 2015, Journal of Child Language.

[51]  J. Gierut,et al.  Differential learning of phonological oppositions. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[52]  Marilyn M. Vihman,et al.  A note on children's lexical representations , 1982, Journal of Child Language.

[53]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Phonological learning and lexicality of treated stimuli , 2010, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[54]  J. Locke,et al.  The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. Part II: Some clinically novel procedures. Their use, some findings. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[55]  J. Barlow,et al.  Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation. , 2002, Seminars in speech and language.

[56]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of Vox Humana , 2010, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[57]  Gordon D. A. Brown A frequency count of 190,000 words in theLondon-Lund Corpus of English Conversation , 1984 .

[58]  B. Munson,et al.  Measuring Speech-Sound Learning Using Visual Analog Scaling , 2012 .

[59]  H. Storkel Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[60]  Jessica A Barlow,et al.  A comparison of word lexicality in the treatment of speech sound disorders , 2011, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[61]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  A corpus of consonant–vowel–consonant real words and nonwords: Comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[62]  J. Gierut,et al.  Homonymy in phonological change. , 1991, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[63]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[64]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings , 1980 .

[65]  A. Williams,et al.  Intensity in phonological intervention: Is there a prescribed amount? , 2012, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[66]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .