Effects of statistical noise on graphic analysis of PET neuroreceptor studies.

UNLABELLED Because of its computational simplicity, the graphic method introduced by Logan et al. is frequently used to analyze time-activity curves of reversible radiotracers measured in brain regions with PET. The graphic method uses a nonlinear transformation of data to variables that have an asymptotically linear relationship. Compared with compartmental analysis of untransformed data, the graphic method enables derivation of regional distribution volumes that are free from assumptions about the underlying compartmental configuration. In this article, we describe statistical bias associated with this nonlinear transformation method. METHODS Theoretic analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and statistical analysis of PET data were used to test the graphic method for bias. RESULTS Mean zero noise is associated with underestimation of distribution volumes when data are analyzed with graphic analysis, whereas this effect does not occur when the same data are analyzed by nonlinear regression and compartmental analysis. Moreover, this effect depends on the magnitude of the distribution volume, so that the bias is more pronounced in regions with high receptor density than regions with low receptor density or no receptors (region of reference). CONCLUSION These results indicate that conventional kinetic analysis of untransformed data is less sensitive to mean zero noise than is graphic analysis of nonlinearly transformed data.

[1]  M Slifstein,et al.  Validation and Reproducibility of Measurement of 5-HT1A Receptor Parameters with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in Humans: Comparison of Arterial and Reference Tissue Input Functions , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Graphical Analysis of Reversible Radioligand Binding from Time—Activity Measurements Applied to [N-11C-Methyl]-(−)-Cocaine PET Studies in Human Subjects , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[5]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  Christer Halldin,et al.  PET Studies of Binding Competition between Endogenous Dopamine and the D1 Radiotracer [11C]NNC 756 , 1998, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Parsey,et al.  PET Studies of Binding Competition Between Endogenous Dopamine and the D 1 , 1999 .

[8]  Christer Halldin,et al.  Measurement of Striatal and Extrastriatal Dopamine D1 Receptor Binding Potential With [11C]NNC 112 in Humans: Validation and Reproducibility , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[9]  J Sandell,et al.  Carbon-11-NNC 112: a radioligand for PET examination of striatal and neocortical D1-dopamine receptors. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[11]  G. Scatchard,et al.  THE ATTRACTIONS OF PROTEINS FOR SMALL MOLECULES AND IONS , 1949 .

[12]  J S Fowler,et al.  Reproducibility of repeated measures of carbon-11-raclopride binding in the human brain. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  N. Simpson,et al.  PET Studies of Binding Competition between Endogenous Dopamine and the D1 Radiotracer [11C]NNC 756 , 1998, NeuroImage.