Flight Dynamics Modeling and Control of a Novel Catapult Launched Tandem-Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle With Variable Sweep

In this paper, the variable sweep is used as a replacement for the conventional control surfaces for flight control on a tandem-wing micro aerial vehicle (MAV). This configuration allows the MAV to be folded into and launched from a tubular catapult while also retaining an adequately high effectiveness and a simple structure. As new control inputs, the four sweep angles of the MAV are planned as symmetric and asymmetric morphing to eliminate the reactive forces between the airfoils and fuselage during morphing. The aerodynamic characteristics of the MAV are presented through numerical simulations to study the effects of variable sweep morphing. An accurate nonlinear multibody dynamic model of the variable sweep MAV is established using the Kane method. Next, open-loop dynamic responses of sweep morphing based on the nonlinear dynamic model are analyzed and compared with the responses caused by the elevons control mode to examine the control effectiveness. Moreover, a flight control law based on sweep control is designed and verified using a height and yaw tracking simulation with different actuator response rates. The results show that the sweep control mode produces weaker coupling between the longitudinal and lateral dynamics than the elevons control mode and that the innovative approach for flight control is feasible and effective.

[1]  Rick Lind,et al.  Effects of Time-Varying Inertias on Flight Dynamics of an Asymmetric Variable-Sweep Morphing Aircraft , 2007 .

[2]  Zhongxi Hou,et al.  Dynamic Modeling and Active Morphing Trajectory-Attitude Separation Control Approach for Gull-Wing Aircraft , 2017, IEEE Access.

[3]  Weiguo Xia,et al.  Adaptive Fuzzy Hierarchical Sliding-Mode Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems With Input Saturation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[4]  Peng Shi,et al.  Intelligent Tracking Control for a Class of Uncertain High-Order Nonlinear Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[5]  Kamesh Subbarao,et al.  Modeling of Flight Dynamics of Morphing Wing Aircraft , 2011 .

[6]  Aaron Altman,et al.  Design, Construction, and Testing of a Folding-Wing, Tube-Launched Micro Air Vehicle , 2005 .

[7]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  In-Flight Deployment Dynamics of Inflatable Wings , 2010 .

[8]  Ryan R. Jensen,et al.  Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Environmental Remote Sensing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .

[9]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  Design Limitations of Deployable Wings for Small Low Altitude UAVs , 2009 .

[10]  Daniel Biezad,et al.  Design of a Tube-Launched UAV , 2004 .

[11]  Peter Xiaoping Liu,et al.  Adaptive Fuzzy Decentralized Control for a Class of Strong Interconnected Nonlinear Systems With Unmodeled Dynamics , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[12]  Rick Lind,et al.  Time-varying dynamics of a micro air vehicle with variable-sweep morphing , 2009 .

[13]  T. Mueller,et al.  TIP VORTEX/AIRFOIL INTERACTION FOR A LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER CANARD/WING CONFIGURATION , 1991 .

[14]  Robert R. Meyer,et al.  Techniques used in the F-14 variable-sweep transition flight experiment , 1988 .

[15]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[16]  G. Q. Zhang,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamics of a morphing tandem-wing unmanned aerial vehicle , 2012 .

[17]  L. Tong,et al.  Multi-body dynamic modelling and flight control for an asymmetric variable sweep morphing UAV , 2014 .

[18]  Jie Zhao,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a novel catapult launched morphing tandem-wing unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .

[19]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A drone with insect-inspired folding wings , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[20]  Jie Zhao,et al.  Application of cycle variable pitch propeller to morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[21]  M. Kovač,et al.  Wind and water tunnel testing of a morphing aquatic micro air vehicle , 2017, Interface Focus.

[22]  Kim Wright,et al.  Investigating the use of wing sweep for pitch control of a small unmanned air vehicle , 2011 .

[23]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Investigation of Variable Wing-Sweep for Applications in Micro Air Vehicles , 2005 .

[24]  Scott Kuindersma,et al.  A Variable Forward-Sweep Wing Design for Enhanced Perching in Micro Aerial Vehicles , 2017 .

[25]  Daobo Wang,et al.  Information Fusion-Based Optimal Attitude Control for an Alterable Thrust Direction Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2013 .

[26]  Wei Han,et al.  Modeling of a space flexible probe–cone docking system based on the Kane method , 2014 .

[27]  Peter Ifju,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPOSITE BENDABLE-WING MICRO AIR VEHICLE , 2007 .

[28]  S. J. Tang,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of a morphing UAV with variable sweep and variable span , 2015 .

[29]  Colin Greatwood,et al.  Perched landing manoeuvres with a variable sweep wing UAV , 2017 .

[30]  Rick Lind,et al.  Flight Testing and Response Characteristics of a Variable Gull-Wing Morphing Aircraft , 2004 .

[31]  Moti Karpel,et al.  Computational Aeroelastic Simulation of Rapidly Morphing Air Vehicles , 2010 .

[32]  Lixin Wang,et al.  Flight dynamic modeling and control for a telescopic wing morphing aircraft via asymmetric wing morphing , 2017 .