Integrating Attributional and Distributional Information in a Probabilistic Model of Meaning Representation

In this paper we present models of how meaning is represented in the brain/mind, based upon the assumption that children develop meaning representations for words using two main sources of information: information derived from their concrete experience with objects and events in the world (which we refer to as attributional information) and information implicitly derived from exposure to language (which we refer to as distributional information). In the first part of the paper we present a model developed using self-organising maps (SOMs) starting from speaker-generated features (properties that speakers considered to be important in defining and describing the meaning of a word). This model captures meaning similarity between words based solely upon attributional information and has been shown to be successful in predicting a number of behavioural semantic effects. In the second part of the paper, we present a probabilistic model that goes beyond attributional information alone, integrating this information with distributional information derived from text corpora. The ability of this integrated model to learn semantic relationships is demonstrated with reference to comparable probabilistic models that use only attributional or distributional information.

[1]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Prediction and Semantic Association , 2002, NIPS.

[2]  P. Bloom Mindreading, Communication and the Learning of Names for Things , 2002 .

[3]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[5]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Inference, Attention, and Decision in a Bayesian Neural Architecture , 2004, NIPS.

[6]  J. Russell Developmental psychology , 1980, Nature.

[7]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic distance effects on object and action naming , 2002, Cognition.

[9]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. , 1991, Psychological review.

[14]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[15]  S. Scott,et al.  The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  J. R. Firth,et al.  A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955 , 1957 .

[17]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[19]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[20]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .