Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating

Several building codes propose methodologies to account for epistemic uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by selecting a knowledge level and reducing material strengths by means of the associated value of the confidence factor. Previous works showed that, in the case of masonry structures, this approach has various limitations, such as the lack of proper consideration of experimental tests performed. This article focuses on the issue of imperfect knowledge on material properties of existing masonry buildings and proposes a probabilistic methodology for the assessment, based on Bayesian updating of mechanical properties. The use of a Bayesian approach allows to update the values of the material properties assumed a priori as knowledge on the building increases, by taking into account all the experimental information gathered during the assessment process. A large number of simulated assessments is carried out and the values of the confidence factors on material properties are defined through the comparison between the obtained results and those of the reference structure, assumed to be perfectly known. These factors are useful in a more general framework for the assessment of masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty.

[1]  Renato Giannini,et al.  Assessment of concrete strength combining direct and NDT measures via Bayesian inference , 2014 .

[2]  Guido Magenes,et al.  DEFINITION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF EXISTING MASONRY ACCOUNTING FOR EXPERIMENTAL KNOWLEDGE BY BAYESIAN UPDATING , 2015 .

[3]  Guido Magenes,et al.  A framework for the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty , 2014 .

[4]  Raimundo Delgado,et al.  Erratum to: Evaluation of the EC8-3 confidence factors for the characterization of concrete strength in existing structures , 2012 .

[5]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[6]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Updating robust reliability using structural test data , 2001 .

[7]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Evaluation of the EC8-3 confidence factors for the characterization of concrete strength in existing structures , 2012 .

[8]  Antonio Borri,et al.  A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[9]  Mirko Corigliano,et al.  ASCONA: Automated Selection of COmpatible Natural Accelerograms , 2012 .

[10]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2014 .

[11]  A. Penna Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Fragilities with Application to RC Frames , 1998 .

[14]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Knowledge-Based Performance Assessment of Existing RC Buildings , 2011 .

[15]  G. Marsaglia Ratios of Normal Variables , 2006 .

[16]  A. Penna,et al.  A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses , 2010 .

[17]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PUSHOVER-BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[18]  Yuri Z. Totoev,et al.  Shear modulus and stiffness of brickwork masonry: An experimental perspective , 2005 .

[19]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering , 2006 .

[20]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Seismic Assessment of Existing Masonry Buildings , 2012 .

[21]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Identification of Suitable Limit States from Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Masonry Structures , 2014 .

[22]  A. Vignoli,et al.  In situ shear and compression tests in ancient stone masonry walls of Tuscany, Italy , 2003 .

[23]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[24]  Maria Rosa Valluzzi,et al.  Compression and Sonic Tests to Assess Effectiveness of Grout Injection on Three-Leaf Stone Masonry Walls , 2014 .

[25]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns based on Experimental Observations , 2002 .

[26]  P. Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance Based Seismic Design , 2001 .

[27]  Moshe Livneh,et al.  Optimal Quality Characteristic Evaluation for Asphalt Mixing Plants , 2003 .

[28]  Guido Magenes,et al.  ISSUES ON THE USE OF TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS FOR THE DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF MASONRY STRUCTURES , 2014 .

[29]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design , 2000 .

[30]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Envelope‐based pushover analysis procedure for the approximate seismic response analysis of buildings , 2014 .

[31]  J. Beck,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation , 2002 .

[32]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Application of Bayesian techniques to material strength evaluation and calibration of confidence factors , 2009 .

[33]  Luís F. Ramos,et al.  A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: The Saint Torcato church case study , 2015 .

[34]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  ON THE USE OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING MASONRY BUILDINGS , 2006 .

[35]  M. Byers The confidence factor. , 2004, The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association.

[36]  Mirko Corigliano,et al.  Mesozonation of the Italian territory for the definition of real spectrum-compatible accelerograms , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[37]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[38]  S. Cattari,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for setting up the investigation protocol and defining proper confidence factors for masonry buildings , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[39]  A. Penna,et al.  In-plane cyclic response of low-density AAC URM walls , 2016 .

[40]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF HISTORIC MASONRIES , 2000 .

[41]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Seismic Performance of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Masonry: From Experimental Testing of the In-Plane Capacity of Walls to Building Response Simulation , 2011 .

[42]  Antonio Borri,et al.  Determination of Shear Strength of Masonry Panels Through Different Tests , 2015 .

[43]  Robert G. Drysdale,et al.  Masonry Structures: Behavior and Design , 1993 .

[44]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[45]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[46]  A. Penna,et al.  Experimental characterisation of stone masonry mechanical properties , 2010 .

[47]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Bayesian Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Concrete , 1998 .

[48]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures , 2010 .

[49]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  The Bayesian choice , 1994 .