Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry

Quantifying the topography of rivers and their associated bedforms has been a fundamental concern of fluvial geomorphology for decades. Such data, acquired at high temporal and spatial resolutions, are increasingly in demand for process‐oriented investigations of flow hydraulics, sediment dynamics and in‐stream habitat. In these riverine environments, the most challenging region for topographic measurement is the wetted, submerged channel. Generally, dry bed topography and submerged bathymetry are measured using different methods and technology. This adds to the costs, logistical challenges and data processing requirements of comprehensive river surveys. However, some technologies are capable of measuring the submerged topography. Through‐water photogrammetry and bathymetric LiDAR are capable of reasonably accurate measurements of channel beds in clear water. While the cost of bathymetric LiDAR remains high and its resolution relatively coarse, the recent developments in photogrammetry using Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms promise a fundamental shift in the accessibility of topographic data for a wide range of settings. Here we present results demonstrating the potential of so called SfM‐photogrammetry for quantifying both exposed and submerged fluvial topography at the mesohabitat scale. We show that imagery acquired from a rotary‐winged Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) can be processed in order to produce digital elevation models (DEMs) with hyperspatial resolutions (c. 0.02 m) for two different river systems over channel lengths of 50–100 m. Errors in submerged areas range from 0.016 m to 0.089 m, which can be reduced to between 0.008 m and 0.053 m with the application of a simple refraction correction. This work therefore demonstrates the potential of UAS platforms and SfM‐photogrammetry as a single technique for surveying fluvial topography at the mesoscale (defined as lengths of channel from c.10 m to a few hundred metres). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[2]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[3]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[4]  David Gilvear,et al.  Quantification of channel bed morphology in gravel-bed rivers using airborne multispectral imagery and aerial photography , 1997 .

[5]  J. Ward.  RIVERINE LANDSCAPES: BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS, DISTURBANCE REGIMES, AND AQUATIC CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[6]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[7]  M. Newson,et al.  Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges , 2000 .

[8]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  The development of an automated correction ­procedure for digital photogrammetry for the study of wide, shallow, gravel‐bed rivers , 2000 .

[9]  S. Lane,et al.  The Measurement of River Channel Morphology Using Digital Photogrammetry , 2000 .

[10]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Automated extraction of grain-size data from gravel surfaces using digital image processing , 2001 .

[11]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF CLEAR-WATER, SHALLOW, GRAVEL-BED RIVERS USING DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2001 .

[12]  E. M. Lee,et al.  Geomorphological mapping , 2001, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication.

[13]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[14]  E. Herricks,et al.  A Multiscale Conceptual Framework for Integrated Ecogeomorphological Research to Support Stream Naturalization in the Agricultural Midwest , 2002, Environmental management.

[15]  L. Mertes,et al.  Remote sensing of riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[16]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[17]  S. Lane,et al.  Through‐Water Close Range Digital Photogrammetry in Flume and Field Environments , 2002 .

[18]  S. Lane,et al.  Remote survey of large-scale braided, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost-effective non-metric close-range digital photogrammetry and its application to a study of coarse gravel river beds , 2003 .

[20]  K. Tockner,et al.  Landscape ecology: a framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  W. Andrew Marcus,et al.  Passive optical remote sensing of river channel morphology and in-stream habitat: Physical basis and feasibility , 2004 .

[22]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[23]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[24]  Henri Eisenbeiss,et al.  PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DOCUMENTATION OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (PALPA, PERU) USING AN AUTONOMOUS MODEL HELICOPTER , 2005 .

[25]  John G. Fryer.  A simple system for photogrammetric mapping in shallow water , 2006 .

[26]  John G. Fryer,et al.  Errors in depth determination caused by waves in through-water photogrammetry , 2006 .

[27]  Steven M. Seitz,et al.  Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[28]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Feature based image processing methods applied to bathymetric measurements from airborne remote sensing in fluvial environments , 2006 .

[29]  G. Heritage,et al.  Towards a protocol for laser scanning in fluvial geomorphology , 2007 .

[30]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  J. Nelson,et al.  Evaluation of an Experimental LiDAR for Surveying a Shallow, Braided, Sand-Bedded River , 2007 .

[32]  S. Dugdale.  An evaluation of imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for the mapping of intertidal macroalgae on Seal Sands, Tees Estuary, UK , 2007 .

[33]  C. Delacourt,et al.  Very high spatial resolution imagery for channel bathymetry and topography from an unmanned mapping controlled platform , 2007 .

[34]  G. C. Tewinkel.  Water Depths from Aerial Photographs , 2008 .

[35]  Albert Rango,et al.  A PROCEDURE FOR ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SUB-DECIMETER RESOLUTION IMAGERY OBTAINED WITH AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) , 2008 .

[36]  J. Chandler,et al.  A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model , 2008 .

[37]  A. Large,et al.  A predictive typology for characterising hydromorphology , 2008 .

[38]  Jean-Stéphane Bailly,et al.  Very-high-resolution mapping of river-immersed topography by remote sensing , 2008 .

[39]  High Resolution Remote Sensing for Understanding Instream Habitat , 2008 .

[40]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Spectrally based remote sensing of river bathymetry , 2009 .

[41]  R. Dunford,et al.  Potential and constraints of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle technology for the characterization of Mediterranean riparian forest , 2009 .

[42]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  High spatial resolution data acquisition for the geosciences: kite aerial photography , 2009 .

[43]  Dave Nagel,et al.  Remote Sensing of Channels and Riparian Zones with a Narrow-Beam Aquatic-Terrestrial LIDAR , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[44]  James Brasington,et al.  Accuracy assessment of aerial photographs acquired using lighter‐than‐air blimps: low‐cost tools for mapping river corridors , 2009 .

[45]  J. Brasington,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets , 2009 .

[46]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Quantifying the temporal dynamics of wood in large rivers: field trials of wood surveying, dating, tracking, and monitoring techniques , 2009 .

[47]  D. Milan,et al.  Mapping hydraulic biotopes using terrestrial laser scan data of water surface properties , 2010 .

[48]  Stephen E. Darby,et al.  An analytical method to estimate failure plane angle and tension crack depth for use in riverbank stability analyses , 2010 .

[49]  J. Bailly,et al.  Geostatistical estimations of bathymetric LiDAR errors on rivers , 2010 .

[50]  R. E. Thomas,et al.  Quantification of braided river channel change using archival digital image analysis , 2010 .

[51]  Paul Raven,et al.  A review of river habitat characterisation methods: indices vs. characterisation protocols , 2011, Limnetica.

[52]  R. Dunford,et al.  Analysis of Post-flood Recruitment Patterns in Braided-Channel Rivers at Multiple Scales Based on an Image Series Collected by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Ultra-light Aerial Vehicles, and Satellites , 2011 .

[53]  J. Chandler,et al.  Minimising systematic error surfaces in digital elevation models using oblique convergent imagery , 2011 .

[54]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[55]  M. Lapointe.  River Geomorphology and Salmonid Habitat: Some Examples Illustrating their Complex Association, from Redd to Riverscape Scales , 2012 .

[56]  Frank Vermeulen,et al.  Mapping by matching: a computer vision-based approach to fast and accurate georeferencing of archaeological aerial photographs , 2012 .

[57]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[58]  W. Andrew Marcus,et al.  Management Applications of Optical Remote Sensing in the Active River Channel , 2012 .

[59]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[60]  W. Marcus,et al.  Remote Sensing of the Hydraulic Environment in Gravel‐Bed Rivers , 2012 .

[61]  J. Travelletti,et al.  UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide : evaluation and results. , 2012 .

[62]  Damià Vericat,et al.  Through‐water terrestrial laser scanning of gravel beds at the patch scale , 2012 .

[63]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[64]  C. Legleiter.  Remote measurement of river morphology via fusion of LiDAR topography and spectrally based bathymetry , 2012 .

[65]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[66]  Remotely Sensed Topographic Change in Gravel Riverbeds with Flowing Channels , 2012 .

[67]  Getting computer vision airborne: using structure from motion for accurate orthophoto production , 2012 .

[68]  W. Marcus,et al.  Making riverscapes real , 2012 .

[69]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Geosalar: Innovative Remote Sensing Methods for Spatially Continuous Mapping of Fluvial Habitat at Riverscape Scale , 2012 .

[70]  D. Feurer,et al.  Airborne LiDAR Methods Applied to Riverine Environments , 2012 .

[71]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  MAPPING RIVER DEPTH FROM PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AERIAL IMAGES , 2013 .

[72]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): Feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model , 2013 .

[73]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[74]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  Mapping River Bathymetry With a Small Footprint Green LiDAR: Applications and Challenges 1 , 2013 .

[75]  J. Brasington,et al.  Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2014 .

[76]  C. Legleiter.  A geostatistical framework for quantifying the reach-scale spatial structure of river morphology: 2. Application to restored and natural channels☆ , 2014 .

[77]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  A geostatistical framework for quantifying the reach-scale spatial structure of river morphology: 1. Variogram models, related metrics, and relation to channel form , 2014 .

[78]  J. M.R,et al.  UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide : Evaluation and results , 2014 .

[79]  Chris E. Jordan,et al.  A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers , 2014 .

[80]  J. Brasington,et al.  Hyperscale terrain modelling of braided rivers: fusing mobile terrestrial laser scanning and optical bathymetric mapping , 2014 .

[81]  Damià Vericat,et al.  EVALUATING SHALLOW‐WATER BATHYMETRY FROM THROUGH‐WATER TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING UNDER A RANGE OF HYDRAULIC AND PHYSICAL WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS , 2014 .